On 3/8/2014 5:22 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
This is the problem step:
gdalwarp -rcs -ts 8800 6600 -s_srs EPSG:32662 -t_srs EPSG:4326 temp.tif
target.tif
gdalinfo -mm -stats target.tif
is showing that the range of values in the image are dramatically
different on the two servers!
summary old:
B
Perhaps differences in the hdf driver between the two versions could
explain differences in output.
Try converting netcdf file to gtiff with gdal_translate (using one gdal
version), then try gdalwarp from that common gtiff file.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> >
> >
> > Th
>
>
> This is the problem step:
>
> gdalwarp -rcs -ts 8800 6600 -s_srs EPSG:32662 -t_srs EPSG:4326 temp.tif
> target.tif
>
> gdalinfo -mm -stats target.tif
>
> is showing that the range of values in the image are dramatically
> different on the two servers!
>
> summary old:
> Band 1 Block=880
Hi All,
First off, sorry this is really long with all the gdalinfo pasted into
it, but I thought is might be more useful to have real information to
look at.
I have been running down a problem caused by upgrading a server to a
newer version of gdal. Here are the details:
old server: GDAL 1
