Re: [gdal-dev] Proposed updates to the GDAL feature style spec

I have made the update in https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/41230, with corrections in https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/41235. You can view the refreshed spec at http://www.gdal.org/ogr_feature_style.html Alan -- Alan Thomas Software Developer ThinkSpatial

Re: [gdal-dev] Proposed updates to the GDAL feature style spec

Alan, I'm also supportive of your change while not having a strong opinion on the ogr-brush-1 issue. Thanks for showing some love to feature styles *including* the specification. Best regards, Frank On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:52 AM, Alan Thomas wrote: > Thanks for

Re: [gdal-dev] Proposed updates to the GDAL feature style spec

Thanks for the feedback, Even. If there is no other feedback in the next few days I will merge the change, as well as an extra code fix to implement change 8. On 2 January 2018 at 21:47, Even Rouault wrote: >> 5. [...] change the definition of >> ogr-brush-1 to mean a

Re: [gdal-dev] Proposed updates to the GDAL feature style spec

Alan, Thanks a lot for this refresh ! I've just a single remark > 5. [...] change the definition of > ogr-brush-1 to mean a solid fill in the selected background color; > change the suggested default for BRUSH bc to transparent (#FF00). > > Rationale: The spec is not explicit on how fc and

[gdal-dev] Proposed updates to the GDAL feature style spec

Hello all, In updating the PDF vector feature writer, it became apparent that there are some deficiencies in the GDAL feature style specification document (http://www.gdal.org/ogr_feature_style.html). I thought this would be a good opportunity to update the document in other ways as well. See