Even Rouault even.rouault at mines-paris.org writes:
I don't want to deny there is a problem when issuing ogrinfo, but I'm not
sure that setting a default MAXFEATURES on client side is appropriate.
The issue is more with GetExtent() and the fact that the reported extent
in
Even Rouault even.rouault at mines-paris.org writes:
How about having an option -TRUST_GETCAPABILITIES=TRUE and use it as
a default value? So number of feature could be examined with
resulttype=hits and extents could be taken as they are in the
getCapabilities. Or perhaps they could be
Selon Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi:
Even Rouault even.rouault at mines-paris.org writes:
How about having an option -TRUST_GETCAPABILITIES=TRUE and use it as
a default value? So number of feature could be examined with
resulttype=hits and extents could be taken as they are
Even Rouault wrote:
Selon Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi:
Even Rouault even.rouault at mines-paris.org writes:
How about having an option -TRUST_GETCAPABILITIES=TRUE
and use it as
a default value? So number of feature could be examined with
resulttype=hits and
But is it ever safe to
guess the schema by investigating just the first feature? If the
attribute is not compulsory in the schema and the value
happens to be empty then it is not included at all in the GML of
the first feature. Doesn't this mean that GML driver creates a
schema without that
