Re: [gdal-dev] WCS 1.1 in GDAL

2017-11-01 Thread Ari Jolma
Even Rouault kirjoitti 01.11.2017 klo 13:20: On mercredi 1 novembre 2017 13:05:09 CET Ari Jolma wrote: > Anyway, the question is, should gdalgmlcoverage.cpp be in the gcore? Feel free to move it to frmts/wcs as it only used by it. You'd probably want to remove the declaration of it from

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS 1.1 in GDAL

2017-11-01 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 1 novembre 2017 13:05:09 CET Ari Jolma wrote: > Ari Jolma kirjoitti 01.11.2017 klo 11:04: > > It seems to me that WCS 1.1 has been dormant and perhaps nobody has > > really used it ever(?). > > > > I just found the gdalgmlcoverage.cpp file in gcore, which is only used > > by the WCS

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS 1.1 in GDAL

2017-11-01 Thread Ari Jolma
Ari Jolma kirjoitti 01.11.2017 klo 11:04: It seems to me that WCS 1.1 has been dormant and perhaps nobody has really used it ever(?). I just found the gdalgmlcoverage.cpp file in gcore, which is only used by the WCS driver and only in its 1.1 part Actually, in 1.0, since 1.1 does not seem

[gdal-dev] WCS 1.1 in GDAL

2017-11-01 Thread Ari Jolma
It seems to me that WCS 1.1 has been dormant and perhaps nobody has really used it ever(?). I just found the gdalgmlcoverage.cpp file in gcore, which is only used by the WCS driver and only in its 1.1 part and it hasn't really been changed since Frank wrote it ten years ago. I basically