On 14-12-12 10:10, Even Rouault wrote:
I also believe that the current WKT definition is known to be a bit hackish (is
there some official/generally agreed name for the projection that should be used
?). But you are probably using not the most recent version of GDAL, since recent
versions include
On 14-12-12 10:10, Even Rouault wrote:
Selon Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt :
I also believe that the current WKT definition is known to be a bit hackish (is
there some official/generally agreed name for the projection that should be used
?). But you are probably using not the most recent version of GDAL,
Selon Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt :
> When running 'epsg_tr.py -wkt 3857', gdal produces the WKT listed below.
> I believe the projection that is stated in the WKT is incorrect though.
> The combination of WGS 84 as base geogcs with Mercator_1SP as projection
> means that the regular ellipsoidal Mercator
When running 'epsg_tr.py -wkt 3857', gdal produces the WKT listed below.
I believe the projection that is stated in the WKT is incorrect though.
The combination of WGS 84 as base geogcs with Mercator_1SP as projection
means that the regular ellipsoidal Mercator projection will be used
which is
