Re: [gdal-dev] WMTS - Need TileLevel option Servers responding with bad capabilities

2016-12-19 Thread esacree
Even, Ah! You are correct. I just loaded the 17-Dec-2016 daily stable branch. Wrong one. Thank you for checking the syntax for me. WMTS should be good to go for the next release of GDAL. I have 5 other map server types working correctly now. Thanks for your help! Elaine -- View this

Re: [gdal-dev] WMTS - Need TileLevel option Servers responding with bad capabilities

2016-12-19 Thread Even Rouault
> I've tried both the "TileLevel" and the "ZoomLevel" parameters both > separately and together. The URL still shows the maximum tile zoom level on > the request. You are probably not using a trunk build or a recent enough trunk build. Your XML works fine for me and results in level 14 being

Re: [gdal-dev] WMTS - Need TileLevel option Servers responding with bad capabilities

2016-12-19 Thread esacree
I've tried both the "TileLevel" and the "ZoomLevel" parameters both separately and together. The URL still shows the maximum tile zoom level on the request. http://basemap.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/USGSShadedReliefOnly/MapServer/WMTS/1.0.0/WMTSCapabilities.xml

Re: [gdal-dev] WMTS - Need TileLevel option Servers responding with bad capabilities

2016-12-16 Thread Even Rouault
On vendredi 16 décembre 2016 13:14:37 CET esacree wrote: > Even, > > I tried the daily build from 9-Dec-2016. The new ZoomLevel parameter is > there and the value is extracted. Unfortunately, GDAL is still using the > maximum tile level from the capabilities document. That works fine for me.

Re: [gdal-dev] WMTS - Need TileLevel option Servers responding with bad capabilities

2016-12-16 Thread esacree
Even, I tried the daily build from 9-Dec-2016. The new ZoomLevel parameter is there and the value is extracted. Unfortunately, GDAL is still using the maximum tile level from the capabilities document. USGS hasn't responded to my request to fix their capabilities documents. ESRI's world time

Re: [gdal-dev] WMTS - Need TileLevel option Servers responding with bad capabilities

2016-12-04 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 30 novembre 2016 12:55:57 CET esacree wrote: > Question: Is it possible to get a TileLevel option added to the new GDAL > WMTS driver? > > Reason: WMTS servers at USGS and ESRI are returning XML Capabilities with > TileLevel 18 (Google) or TileLevel 19 (default028mm). The USGS

Re: [gdal-dev] WMTS - Need TileLevel option Servers responding with bad capabilities

2016-12-01 Thread jratike80
esacree wrote > Question: Is it possible to get a TileLevel option added to the new GDAL > WMTS driver? > > Reason: WMTS servers at USGS and ESRI are returning XML Capabilities with > TileLevel 18 (Google) or TileLevel 19 (default028mm). The USGS help desk > said that the tile servers are

[gdal-dev] WMTS - Need TileLevel option Servers responding with bad capabilities

2016-11-30 Thread esacree
Question: Is it possible to get a TileLevel option added to the new GDAL WMTS driver? Reason: WMTS servers at USGS and ESRI are returning XML Capabilities with TileLevel 18 (Google) or TileLevel 19 (default028mm). The USGS help desk said that the tile servers are only serving up to Tile