Hi List,
I have a reprojectiion tool which creates GeoTIFFs with NoData = NaN.
I'm creating couple of GeoTIFFs with partially overlapping areas where
GeoTIFF1 has NaNs in a region and GeoTIFF2 has proper values in the same
overlapping region and viceversa (GeoTIFF2 has some NaN area while GeoTIFF1
Le lundi 02 mai 2016 14:37:39, Daniele Romagnoli a écrit :
> Hi List,
>
> I have a reprojectiion tool which creates GeoTIFFs with NoData = NaN.
> I'm creating couple of GeoTIFFs with partially overlapping areas where
> GeoTIFF1 has NaNs in a region and GeoTIFF2 has proper values in the same
> over
Hi Even.
Thanks for the feedback.
Sorry... I'm using GDAL 1.11.3.
I'm going to double check to make sure I didn't make any mistake.
I'll let you know.
Cheers,
Daniele
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le lundi 02 mai 2016 14:37:39, Daniele Romagnoli a écrit :
> > Hi List,
Hi Even,
The produced GeoTIFF doesn't contain any nodata metadata/flag/TAG.
It simply has "NaN" pixels. QuantumGIS report those pixels as "nan" and
OpenEV report them as 1.#QNAN so I think they are properly "recognized" as
NaN.
I'm wondering if the GDAL utilities explicitly look for some metadata/
Le lundi 02 mai 2016 15:16:30, Daniele Romagnoli a écrit :
> Hi Even,
> The produced GeoTIFF doesn't contain any nodata metadata/flag/TAG.
> It simply has "NaN" pixels. QuantumGIS report those pixels as "nan" and
> OpenEV report them as 1.#QNAN so I think they are properly "recognized" as
> NaN.
>
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le lundi 02 mai 2016 15:16:30, Daniele Romagnoli a écrit :
> > Hi Even,
> > The produced GeoTIFF doesn't contain any nodata metadata/flag/TAG.
> > It simply has "NaN" pixels. QuantumGIS report those pixels as "nan" and
> > OpenEV report them a
Le lundi 02 mai 2016 15:37:58, Daniele Romagnoli a écrit :
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Even Rouault
>
> wrote:
> > Le lundi 02 mai 2016 15:16:30, Daniele Romagnoli a écrit :
> > > Hi Even,
> > > The produced GeoTIFF doesn't contain any nodata metadata/flag/TAG.
> > > It simply has "NaN" pix
Cool!
Do you think this capability will be backported to 1.11 series too?
Thanks for your assistance.
Cheers,
Daniele
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le lundi 02 mai 2016 15:37:58, Daniele Romagnoli a écrit :
> > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Even Rouault >
> >
> > wrot
Le lundi 02 mai 2016 15:43:42, Daniele Romagnoli a écrit :
> Cool!
> Do you think this capability will be backported to 1.11 series too?
Possibly if you file a ticket about that.
>
> Thanks for your assistance.
> Cheers,
> Daniele
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Even Rouault
>
> wrote:
>
Thanks.
I have just opened this ticket keeping track of that:
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6495#ticket
Cheers,
Daniele
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le lundi 02 mai 2016 15:43:42, Daniele Romagnoli a écrit :
> > Cool!
> > Do you think this capability will be back
10 matches
Mail list logo