Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-12 Thread Ivan Lucena
Even, ---Original Message--- From: Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org To: Ivan Lucena ivan.luc...@pmldnet.com Cc: Simone Giannecchini simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it, gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org, Viji V Nair v...@fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] image-io

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-12 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Even, I am neither trying to cut it short nor I was anyhow offended by your response but you are email is drawing is essence from a few misunderstandings which I would like to clarify before this thread takes more time/space: -1- Viji is trying to package the development version of

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-12 Thread Viji V Nair
Hi On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Simone Giannecchini simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it wrote: Ciao Even, I am neither trying to cut it short nor I was anyhow offended by your response but you are email is drawing is essence from a few  misunderstandings which I would like to clarify

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Even, I have asked daniele to make those changes (which have not been reviewed yet) in order to move away from the explicit usage of Vector and HashTable in method signatures in favour of using the respective interfaces (List and Map). Daniele can add more as needed... As you mentioned this

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Ivan Lucena
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it To: Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org, Viji V Nair v...@fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension Sent: Dec 10 '10 04:27 Ciao Even, I have asked daniele to make those changes (which have not been

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Simone Giannecchini
: Simone Giannecchini simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it  To: Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org  Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org, Viji V Nair v...@fedoraproject.org  Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension  Sent: Dec 10 '10 04:27  Ciao Even,  I have asked daniele to make those changes

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Even Rouault
Le vendredi 10 décembre 2010 10:27:49, Simone Giannecchini a écrit : Ciao Even, I have asked daniele to make those changes (which have not been reviewed yet) in order to move away from the explicit usage of Vector and HashTable in method signatures in favour of using the respective interfaces

[gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-09 Thread Viji V Nair
Hi, I am one of the GDAL co-maintainer for Fedora, I would like to have the image-io extension support, currently it been supported through the following patch from image-io. But I dont think this is a good idea as the modifications are bit heavy.

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-09 Thread Even Rouault
Hi Viji, I maintain the GDAL Java bindings, but the image-io GDAL plugin is another project whose maintener is Daniele I think. He'll correct me if I'm wrong, but I saw his name on http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ImageIO-EXT+GDAL ;-) . I've CC'ed him so he has a chance to comment and