Guys,
given these changes are considered bug-fixes/improvements, would you
approve of adding these changes (when sufficiently tested and matured)
to the 1.8 branch?
If not there are a number of bugfixes (some already commited) that I
would like to commit to 1.8.
Related to this - in what timefr
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 22:04:47, Etienne Tourigny a écrit :
> Even,
>
> I've been thinking about this, and I knew you were going to prefer
> incremental changes, as it would be preferable. However, there's
> about a month of development in there and it would be quite difficult
> to try to se
Even,
I've been thinking about this, and I knew you were going to prefer
incremental changes, as it would be preferable. However, there's
about a month of development in there and it would be quite difficult
to try to separate things in small chunks.
It will also be difficult because there has be
> > As PSC chair I will not be offended if you proceed with netcdf changes
> > *without* a formal RFC type vote on the changes. The changes are fixing
> > bugs and don't cause real backward compatability issues and I'm willing
> > to treat you as the authority/owner for the driver.
>
> OK Frank,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> On 11-10-18 10:19 PM, Etienne Tourigny wrote:
>>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Frank Warmerdam
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Etienne Tourigny
>>> wrote:
2) Change to a default south-up
On 11-10-18 10:19 PM, Etienne Tourigny wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Etienne Tourigny
wrote:
2) Change to a default south-up orientation for NetCDF data
Etienne,
Could you expand on this a bit? In particular I'm
Hi Frank,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Etienne Tourigny
> wrote:
>> 2) Change to a default south-up orientation for NetCDF data
>
> Etienne,
>
> Could you expand on this a bit? In particular I'm wondering if:
>
> 1) Is a south-up fil
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Etienne Tourigny
wrote:
> 2) Change to a default south-up orientation for NetCDF data
Etienne,
Could you expand on this a bit? In particular I'm wondering if:
1) Is a south-up file represented as south up to GDAL applications?
That is, will geotransform[5] be n
Dear devs and users,
As part of ongoing improvements to the netcdf driver (mainly for the
proper export of projected CRS) Patrick Sunter and I have prepared a
document - that may serve as an RFC - to deal with proposed changes to
the netcdf driver export and import.
Most of these changes are nece
