Re: [gdal-dev] update to overview resampling methods?

2012-10-04 Thread Ivan Lucena
On 10/4/12 11:10 PM, Etienne Tourigny wrote: Hi list, I would like to know if the overview resampling methods listed on help pages are really up-to-date, because I found some discrepancies in the docs and code: - gdaladdo utility page / http://www.gdal.org/gdaladdo.html nearest,average,gauss,

Re: [gdal-dev] update to overview resampling methods?

2012-10-05 Thread Even Rouault
Selon Etienne Tourigny : > Hi list, > > I would like to know if the overview resampling methods listed on help > pages are really up-to-date, because I found some discrepancies in the > docs and code: > > > - gdaladdo utility page / http://www.gdal.org/gdaladdo.html > > nearest,average,gauss,cubic

Re: [gdal-dev] update to overview resampling methods?

2012-10-05 Thread Etienne Tourigny
Hi Even, thanks for you time On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > Selon Etienne Tourigny : > >> Hi list, >> >> I would like to know if the overview resampling methods listed on help >> pages are really up-to-date, because I found some discrepancies in the >> docs and code: >> >>

Re: [gdal-dev] update to overview resampling methods?

2012-10-05 Thread Etienne Tourigny
also any objection I change the parameters to upper case in gdaladdo docs, to be in line with the names in the code? Etienne On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Etienne Tourigny wrote: > Hi Even, thanks for you time > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Even Rouault > wrote: >> Selon Etienne Tourigny

Re: [gdal-dev] update to overview resampling methods?

2012-10-05 Thread Even Rouault
> >> > >> 1) why are some methods not listed in GDALDataset::BuildOverviews and > >> gdaladdo docs > >> average_mp, AVERAGE_BIT2*, NO_REGEN (there may be others) > > > > - average_mp is documented in gdaladdo as not ready for use in > > production, so could be likely "undocumented" in gdaladdo m

Re: [gdal-dev] update to overview resampling methods?

2012-10-05 Thread Frank Warmerdam
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > > >> 3) why is AVERAGE_MP considered unfit for use in the gdaladdo docs? > > >> and why is it still available? > > > > > > Historical remain ? Could likely be undocumented. > > > > ok I will remove it, should it be removed/commented from the c

Re: [gdal-dev] update to overview resampling methods?

2012-10-05 Thread Even Rouault
Le vendredi 05 octobre 2012 22:55:34, Frank Warmerdam a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Even Rouault > > wrote: > > > >> 3) why is AVERAGE_MP considered unfit for use in the gdaladdo docs? > > > >> and why is it still available? > > > > > > > > Historical remain ? Could likely be undoc