pril 01, 2009 3:13 PM
> To: Mateusz Loskot
> Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] in memory KML
>
> Seems like libkml would be a good candidate for handling KML in memory.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> Frank Warmerdam
.
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mano Marks
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:13 PM
To: Mateusz Loskot
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] in memory KML
Seems like libkml would be a
Seems like libkml would be a good candidate for handling KML in memory.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>>
>> Clay, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>> After a bit more digging I am not sure I asked the right question.
>>>
>>>
>>> What I want to do is read feature
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Clay, Bruce wrote:
After a bit more digging I am not sure I asked the right question.
What I want to do is read feature information from a shapefile or
other data source and get a string that contains the feature
information encoded in KML that I can pass directly in
Clay, Bruce wrote:
After a bit more digging I am not sure I asked the right question.
What I want to do is read feature information from a shapefile or other
data source and get a string that contains the feature information
encoded in KML that I can pass directly into Google Earth. I know
After a bit more digging I am not sure I asked the right question.
What I want to do is read feature information from a shapefile or other
data source and get a string that contains the feature information
encoded in KML that I can pass directly into Google Earth. I know I can
do this operatio
