On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Even Rouault
even.roua...@mines-paris.org wrote:
In case you feel like testing it, the functions needed are
OGRSpatialReference::importFromProj4() and exportToProj4(), the later
which is not documented.
Perhaps others can comment on the suitability of
How important is this information? Assuming we drop all the citation
strings, or authority names and codes, but retain the important
parameters of each projection (in CF and proj format), are we missing
anything important numerically?
In other words, are there any show-stopper issues that
Thanks for the info Even
I can see that there is not yet One standard to rule them all...
Correct me if I am wrong: is WKT the preferred way GDAL stores the
information?
There was a proposal some time ago in the CF trac to add descriptive
variables such as crs_id (EPSG code), crs_name and
Le mercredi 07 septembre 2011 22:49:58, Etienne Tourigny a écrit :
Thanks for the info Even
I can see that there is not yet One standard to rule them all...
Correct me if I am wrong: is WKT the preferred way GDAL stores the
information?
I'd say that WKT serves as a pivot representation of
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Etienne Tourigny
etiennesky@gmail.com wrote:
Patrick,
A)
your suggestion does make sense, it is imperial that basic datum
information be saved as to adhere to CF-x standard. Are those CF
variables (radius, flattening etc) really sufficient for software
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Patrick Sunter patdeve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Etienne Tourigny
etiennesky@gmail.com wrote:
Patrick,
A)
your suggestion does make sense, it is imperial that basic datum
information be saved as to adhere to CF-x standard.
In case you feel like testing it, the functions needed are
OGRSpatialReference::importFromProj4() and exportToProj4(), the later
which is not documented.
Perhaps others can comment on the suitability of exporttoProj4() ???
It is documented but doxygen didn't like a macro that was
Patrick,
A)
your suggestion does make sense, it is imperial that basic datum
information be saved as to adhere to CF-x standard. Are those CF
variables (radius, flattening etc) really sufficient for software such
as THREDDS?
B)
The other aspect (to save projection_ref so that GDAL can import
