On 03/05/11 15:57, Colomban Wendling wrote:
I'm happy to announce that I've now committed these patches to trunk,
with some little improvements -- an option in the Preference dialog to
configure it, MIO integrated, better code in some places, etc.
Thank you for working on this, it's *extremely*
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:41:40 -0800, Matthew wrote:
On 03/02/11 15:13, Enrico Tröger wrote:
Ideally, I would like to make the filetypes.* part of the official
Geany distribution and not maintain those, and include at least the
You mean replacing the hardcoded colour values in most filetypes.*
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 00:57:32 +0100, Colomban wrote:
Hi all!
Le 19/12/2010 16:05, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
Hi!
[...]
Well! If you apply all these patches, you should have a working,
real-time, in-memory tag parsing that should look good :)
So, what's left? Testing of course, lot of
Am 06.03.2011 14:25, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 00:57:32 +0100, Colomban wrote:
Hi all!
Le 19/12/2010 16:05, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
Hi!
[...]
Well! If you apply all these patches, you should have a working,
real-time, in-memory tag parsing that should look good :)
So,
Am 06.03.2011 15:05, schrieb Thomas Martitz:
Since you link statically, the whole binary package is GPLv3 since
GPLv3 is not compatible to v2. For the source distribution it's up to
each individual source file.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility has a nice
overview
Am 06.03.2011 15:08, schrieb Thomas Martitz:
Am 06.03.2011 15:05, schrieb Thomas Martitz:
Since you link statically, the whole binary package is GPLv3 since
GPLv3 is not compatible to v2. For the source distribution it's up to
each individual source file.
Le 06/03/2011 14:25, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 00:57:32 +0100, Colomban wrote:
Hi all!
Le 19/12/2010 16:05, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
Hi!
[...]
Well! If you apply all these patches, you should have a working,
real-time, in-memory tag parsing that should look good :)
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 15:29:24 +0100, Colomban wrote:
- you use va_copy() in MIO. va_copy is C99 while all the other va_*
functions are C89. So far, we tried to stay compatible with C89 even
though it is old (and it is old, and old). At least some years ago,
there were actually users who had
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:47:56 +0200, Dimitar wrote:
Hi,
It's one month since I initially sent this, and the main developers
seem more or less online now, so I'm resending it.
Haha, this doesn't mean anything, in my case :D.
On several occasions, we discussed that it would be a good thing to
Le 06/03/2011 11:51, Matthew Brush a écrit :
On 03/05/11 15:57, Colomban Wendling wrote:
I'm happy to announce that I've now committed these patches to trunk,
with some little improvements -- an option in the Preference dialog to
configure it, MIO integrated, better code in some places, etc.
On 7 March 2011 03:12, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 15:53:48 +0100
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
Anyway, your patch is committed, thanks a bunch.
I added another small change afterwards which should remain the saved
state for 'case
On 7 March 2011 11:15, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 March 2011 03:12, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 15:53:48 +0100
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
Anyway, your patch is committed, thanks a bunch.
I added another small change
Le 06/03/2011 15:49, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 15:29:24 +0100, Colomban wrote:
- you use va_copy() in MIO. va_copy is C99 while all the other va_*
functions are C89. So far, we tried to stay compatible with C89 even
though it is old (and it is old, and old). At least some
13 matches
Mail list logo
