Am 10.06.2011 02:09, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 06/09/11 10:40, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 27.05.2011 23:31, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Hi,
Would it be useful for someone with admin rights on SourceForge.net to
create a "Patch Tracker"? I've seen some projects with this[1].
We, at Rockbox, are in t
> Unless the patch tracker lives long enough to grow to a couple (say 50)
> patches in which case patches not clearly represented anymore and it's
> de-motivating to even look at the patch tracker, let alone individual
> patches.
In a voluntary project no-one is *required* to do anything with
patc
On 06/10/11 00:01, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Additionally, if the contributor is not motivated enough to bring up
patches again and again then neither the maling list or patch tracker
help. In this case it's simply the contributors fault.
Without going into a rant, I will just say that I could n
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:40:26 +0200
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> We made the following observation after years with a patch tracker. If
> core developers are rare or lack time or can't otherwise regularly look
> at the patches (which is the case for Geany too), [...]
Nothing will work in this case.
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 19:26:16 +0200
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:54:18 +0200
> Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
> > Based on that list I will create a poll upcoming weekend (around
> > June, 4th) - I will announce tis inside another mail with some
> > basic rules.
>
> I've just starte
