Re: [Geany-devel] GTK+ Version Bump to 2.18 - gtkbuilder and 2.16

2011-10-17 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-17 04:27 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: On 18 October 2011 10:17, Matthew Brush wrote: On 11-10-14 07:38 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: On 13/10/2011 12:53, Nick Treleaven wrote: On 13/10/2011 00:55, Matthew Brush wrote: So I would go for 2.16 overall if this brings us Glade 3 support. It s

Re: [Geany-devel] GTK+ Version Bump to 2.18 - gtkbuilder and 2.16

2011-10-17 Thread Lex Trotman
On 18 October 2011 10:17, Matthew Brush wrote: > On 11-10-14 07:38 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: >> >> On 13/10/2011 12:53, Nick Treleaven wrote: >>> >>> On 13/10/2011 00:55, Matthew Brush wrote: > > So I would go for 2.16 overall if this brings us Glade 3 support. It should, but I h

Re: [Geany-devel] GTK+ Version Bump to 2.18 - gtkbuilder and 2.16

2011-10-17 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-14 07:38 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: On 13/10/2011 12:53, Nick Treleaven wrote: On 13/10/2011 00:55, Matthew Brush wrote: So I would go for 2.16 overall if this brings us Glade 3 support. It should, but I haven't thoroughly tested it with GTK+ 2.16 yet. Did you try the gtkbuilder branc

Re: [Geany-devel] GTK+ Version Bump to 2.18 - gtkbuilder and 2.16

2011-10-17 Thread Nick Treleaven
On 15/10/2011 05:07, Matthew Brush wrote: On 11-10-14 08:18 PM, Matthew Brush wrote: There's seems to be a problem applying, saving and restoring the background and foreground colours for the VTE, I couldn't figure it out last time I looked. Not sure if you can have a peek at this, but I guess

Re: [Geany-devel] GTK+ Version Bump to 2.18 - gtkbuilder and 2.16

2011-10-14 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-14 08:18 PM, Matthew Brush wrote: There's seems to be a problem applying, saving and restoring the background and foreground colours for the VTE, I couldn't figure it out last time I looked. Not sure if you can have a peek at this, but I guess you'll need to boot into Linux to test.

Re: [Geany-devel] GTK+ Version Bump to 2.18 - gtkbuilder and 2.16

2011-10-14 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-14 07:38 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: On 13/10/2011 12:53, Nick Treleaven wrote: On 13/10/2011 00:55, Matthew Brush wrote: So I would go for 2.16 overall if this brings us Glade 3 support. It should, but I haven't thoroughly tested it with GTK+ 2.16 yet. Did you try the gtkbuilder branc

Re: [Geany-devel] GTK+ Version Bump to 2.18 - gtkbuilder and 2.16 - on_term_font_set

2011-10-14 Thread Nick Treleaven
On 14/10/2011 15:38, Nick Treleaven wrote: I did get a warning: Gtk WARNING: Could not find signal handler 'on_term_font_set' This is because on_term_font_set is not defined unless VTE support is compiled in (on Windows it's disabled). ___ Geany

Re: [Geany-devel] GTK+ Version Bump to 2.18 - gtkbuilder and 2.16

2011-10-14 Thread Nick Treleaven
On 13/10/2011 12:53, Nick Treleaven wrote: On 13/10/2011 00:55, Matthew Brush wrote: So I would go for 2.16 overall if this brings us Glade 3 support. It should, but I haven't thoroughly tested it with GTK+ 2.16 yet. Did you try the gtkbuilder branch yet on your 2.16 install by any chance? N