Hi,
I've completed the conversion to git. It went quite smoothly because I
did it already before and fortunately the checksums remained the same
so I could reuse the grafts files I already had (to be sure, I checked
all the entries one by one).
The repository is here:
https://github.com/techee/g
On 10/08/2011 05:13 PM, Jiří Techet wrote:
Please have a good look at it. It's no problem to change it now but it
will be hard once people start using it. For this reason please resist
the temptation and don't update your branches on top of the repository
yet. It's safer to wait until everyone a
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 04:57, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 05:13 PM, Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> Please have a good look at it. It's no problem to change it now but it
>> will be hard once people start using it. For this reason please resist
>> the temptation and don't update your branches on
Le 09/10/2011 02:13, Jiří Techet a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've completed the conversion to git. It went quite smoothly because I
> did it already before and fortunately the checksums remained the same
> so I could reuse the grafts files I already had (to be sure, I checked
> all the entries one by one)
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 13:55, Colomban Wendling
wrote:
> Le 09/10/2011 02:13, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've completed the conversion to git. It went quite smoothly because I
>> did it already before and fortunately the checksums remained the same
>> so I could reuse the grafts files I al
Le 09/10/2011 14:36, Jiří Techet a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 13:55, Colomban Wendling
> wrote:
>> Le 09/10/2011 02:13, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've completed the conversion to git. It went quite smoothly because I
>>> did it already before and fortunately the checksums remaine
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 15:38, Colomban Wendling
wrote:
> Le 09/10/2011 14:36, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 13:55, Colomban Wendling
>> wrote:
>>> Le 09/10/2011 02:13, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Hi,
I've completed the conversion to git. It went quite smoothly because I
Le 09/10/2011 16:49, Jiří Techet a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 15:38, Colomban Wendling
> wrote:
>> Le 09/10/2011 14:36, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 13:55, Colomban Wendling
>>> wrote:
>>> [...]
* 03c3b75 (r3679) is a bit weird too, it has d3cdd27 (r3680) as parent,
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 17:59, Colomban Wendling
wrote:
> Le 09/10/2011 16:49, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 15:38, Colomban Wendling
>> wrote:
>>> Le 09/10/2011 14:36, Jiří Techet a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 13:55, Colomban Wendling
wrote:
[...]
> * 03c3
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 17:59:47 +0200, Colomban wrote:
>Le 09/10/2011 16:49, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 15:38, Colomban Wendling
>> wrote:
>>> Le 09/10/2011 14:36, Jiří Techet a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 13:55, Colomban Wendling
wrote:
[...]
> * 03c3b75
Le 09/10/2011 19:03, Jiří Techet a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 17:59, Colomban Wendling
> wrote:
>> Le 09/10/2011 16:49, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 15:38, Colomban Wendling
>>> wrote:
Le 09/10/2011 14:36, Jiří Techet a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 13:55, Co
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 20:15, Colomban Wendling
wrote:
> Le 09/10/2011 19:03, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 17:59, Colomban Wendling
>> wrote:
>>> Le 09/10/2011 16:49, Jiří Techet a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 15:38, Colomban Wendling
wrote:
> Le 09/10/2011 14:
[...]
> IIRC there were problems with the problems with the branch when Nick
> tried to merge it back into trunk with an older SVN client than the one
> the branch was created with. Or something like that.
> Maybe Lex remembers more details. If not, it's probably not that
> critical at all.
>
That
On Sunday 09 October 2011 11:59:47 am Colomban Wendling wrote:
> (speak within ~ the hour or be quiet forever :D)
I have no comments about the git repository, but, with a project with
participants possibly from around the world, one hour is not very much time
to react.
(Yes, I know that the t
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 17:20:16 -0400, Randy wrote:
>On Sunday 09 October 2011 11:59:47 am Colomban Wendling wrote:
>> (speak within ~ the hour or be quiet forever :D)
>
>I have no comments about the git repository, but, with a project with
>participants possibly from around the world, one hour is no
On Sunday 09 October 2011 05:27:47 pm Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 17:20:16 -0400, Randy wrote:
> >(Yes, I know that the test repository has been available longer than
> >that, I just think it's something you need to consider in general (as
> >the new Geany--well, whatever you are now
Hi Randy,
Le 09/10/2011 23:20, Randy Kramer a écrit :
> On Sunday 09 October 2011 11:59:47 am Colomban Wendling wrote:
>> (speak within ~ the hour or be quiet forever :D)
>
> I have no comments about the git repository, but, with a project with
> participants possibly from around the world, one
On Monday 10 October 2011 10:13:03 am Colomban Wendling wrote:
> I'm sorry if it sounded rude, sorry.
Columban,
No problem, I didn't consider it rude--I just used to deal
(professionally--i.e., in my day job) with projects extending over many time
zones and learned the hard way that I had to al
18 matches
Mail list logo
