On 9 April 2011 18:31, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 11:17:20 +1000
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
>> > But CC-BY is allowing this. Maybe CC-BY-SA would be a more GPL-like
>> > flavor of CC.
>>
>> Yes, CC-BY allows modification. IIUC CC-BY-SA would preclude any more
>> than "fair use" quantit
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 11:17:20 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > But CC-BY is allowing this. Maybe CC-BY-SA would be a more GPL-like
> > flavor of CC.
>
> Yes, CC-BY allows modification. IIUC CC-BY-SA would preclude any more
> than "fair use" quantities of material anywhere that is not itself
> license
On 04/08/11 17:01, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 9 April 2011 08:39, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 04/08/11 09:18, Frank Lanitz wrote:
I just want to ask about which license we shall use for the newsletter
in future. I'd like to prefer to put it under terms of one of the
CC-family licenses. CC-BY (by = Gea
> But CC-BY is allowing this. Maybe CC-BY-SA would be a more GPL-like
> flavor of CC.
Yes, CC-BY allows modification. IIUC CC-BY-SA would preclude any more
than "fair use" quantities of material anywhere that is not itself
licensed by CC_BY_SA. For example this might preclude use of
newsletter a
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:01:25 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 9 April 2011 08:39, Matthew Brush wrote:
> > On 04/08/11 09:18, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> >>
> >> I just want to ask about which license we shall use for the
> >> newsletter in future. I'd like to prefer to put it under terms of
> >> one of t
On 9 April 2011 08:39, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 04/08/11 09:18, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>>
>> I just want to ask about which license we shall use for the newsletter
>> in future. I'd like to prefer to put it under terms of one of the
>> CC-family licenses. CC-BY (by = Geany Newsletter Team) would fit
On 04/08/11 09:18, Frank Lanitz wrote:
I just want to ask about which license we shall use for the newsletter
in future. I'd like to prefer to put it under terms of one of the
CC-family licenses. CC-BY (by = Geany Newsletter Team) would fit most
IMHO. What's your opinion?
Anything with free dis
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 13:45:12 -0500
Randy Kramer wrote:
> On Friday 08 April 2011 01:54:13 pm Dominic Hopf wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 18:28 +0200 schrieb Thomas Martitz:
> > > I never heard of licenses for newsletters.
> >
> > Me neither.
>
> Well, it is written material, and, automati
Le 08/04/2011 18:18, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
> Hi people,
>
> I just want to ask about which license we shall use for the newsletter
> in future. I'd like to prefer to put it under terms of one of the
> CC-family licenses. CC-BY (by = Geany Newsletter Team) would fit most
> IMHO. What's your opini
On Friday 08 April 2011 01:54:13 pm Dominic Hopf wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 18:28 +0200 schrieb Thomas Martitz:
> > I never heard of licenses for newsletters.
>
> Me neither.
Well, it is written material, and, automatically (iiuc, according to the
Berne Treaty) subject to copyright (i.e
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 18:28 +0200 schrieb Thomas Martitz:
> Am 08.04.2011 18:18, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
> > Hi people,
> >
> > I just want to ask about which license we shall use for the newsletter
> > in future. I'd like to prefer to put it under terms of one of the
> > CC-family licenses. CC
Am 08.04.2011 18:18, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
Hi people,
I just want to ask about which license we shall use for the newsletter
in future. I'd like to prefer to put it under terms of one of the
CC-family licenses. CC-BY (by = Geany Newsletter Team) would fit most
IMHO. What's your opinion?
I neve
Hi people,
I just want to ask about which license we shall use for the newsletter
in future. I'd like to prefer to put it under terms of one of the
CC-family licenses. CC-BY (by = Geany Newsletter Team) would fit most
IMHO. What's your opinion?
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgp
13 matches
Mail list logo
