Re: [gecode-users] Learning in GeCode/SMT

2008-10-14 Thread Guido Tack
Max wrote: > I finally managed to read "Dechter - Backjump-based backtracking for > constraint satisfaction" and i think it is not restricted to Binary > Constraints, because it is mentioned several times. And i have not > found > the list of allowed pairs in the paper, i thought of nogoods as se

Re: [gecode-users] Learning in GeCode/SMT

2008-10-13 Thread Max
Thank you for the advice with Choco, i will have a look at, but currently i tend to use GeCode. The work by Dechter et al uses a naive model, where CSPs are represented entirely by binary constraints which are given as lists of allowed pairs of values. In this setup, learning

Re: [gecode-users] Learning in GeCode/SMT

2008-10-13 Thread Guido Tack
Just as a quick follow-up, Choco used to have a feature called explanations, which would probably do what you're looking for, but as far as I understand, they have been removed from the current release. Cheers, Guido Max wrote: > At first am just forwarding my private mail contact wi

[gecode-users] Learning in GeCode/SMT

2008-10-13 Thread Max
At first am just forwarding my private mail contact with Guido Tack, as it may be interesting to other on the mailing list. Thank you for the answer. Its a pity that the learning techniques have not made it into CSP yet. I want to integrate a CSP solver into an ASP Solver, a reasoning system fo