On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Malcolm Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/04/2008, at 2:04 AM, Christian Schulte wrote:
> > I know that C++ sounds less appealing but Gecode is first and foremost
> > geared to be good as a C++ library.
>
> Yes. I guess I have to bite the bullet and move to
On 09/04/2008, at 2:04 AM, Christian Schulte wrote:
> The big issue is whether Gecode/J is really the right thing to use
> for you.
> Yes, it is fairly open but no match to Gecode. All requests can be
> instantly
> satisified for Gecode or do not even arise.
>
> I know that C++ sounds less app
The big issue is whether Gecode/J is really the right thing to use for you.
Yes, it is fairly open but no match to Gecode. All requests can be instantly
satisified for Gecode or do not even arise.
I know that C++ sounds less appealing but Gecode is first and foremost
geared to be good as a C++ lib
Is there any reason why JavaBranchingDesc is final in Gecode/J? My
problem naturally has a number of different kinds of branch
descriptions depending on what variable they apply to. It is annoying
to have to encode this into some arbitrary integer and then decode it
again when I commit. It
