> I recently tried compiling the lesstiff HID version of pcb and couldn't.
Details?
> The GTK version I have compiled seems to not care what changes I make to the
> file /opt/pcb/share/pcb/Pcb, and I'm not sure if that is "normal" now.
Yup. Gtk key bindings and menu layout are hard-coded.
>
>> Which hid? Lesstif or gtk?
I picked up the rpm that Werner put together a few weeks ago. I presume
that it is the gtk hid based on where it came from and it's similarity
to what I was running (which was gtk). Any hints for a non-developer
such as myself how to tell for sure?
I j
I recently tried compiling the lesstiff HID version of pcb and couldn't.
I'll eventually figure out that, because I want a way to edit bindkeys so I can
be more productive.
The GTK version I have compiled seems to not care what changes I make to the
file /opt/pcb/share/pcb/Pcb, and I'm not
> Lately I've been creating a lot of footprints for SMD devices. One of
> these devices was a chip resistor.
Which?
> I numbered the two shorter pads in the center and just ignored the
> others.
Try numbering them all the same (i.e. the left three are "1", the
right three are "2").
_
Hi,
Lately I've been creating a lot of footprints for SMD devices. One of
these devices was a chip resistor. I always try to follow the
manufacturer's recommended pad layouts as closely as possible. This is
the problem: the diagram shows that both of the two pads should have a
small notch in the
Werner Hoch wrote:
Hi Joe and all,
On Monday 25 September 2006 21:27, joe tarantino wrote:
I picked up the rpm that Werner put together a few weeks ago. I
presume that it is the gtk hid based on where it came from and it's
similarity to what I was running (which was gtk). Any hints for a
non
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x40055000)
It's the gtk GUI.
> So is the missing grid related to what exporters are config'd? The
> problem is not printing - it's on-screen.
We use the HID interface for exporters and the GUI. We have two GUIs
which are mostly ind
With this install, the binary landed in /usr/bin. It used to be in /usr/local/bin (when I built the previous version from source). And ldd says:... libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
(0x40055000)libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x4031d000)..
Hi Joe and all,
On Monday 25 September 2006 21:27, joe tarantino wrote:
> I picked up the rpm that Werner put together a few weeks ago. I
> presume that it is the gtk hid based on where it came from and it's
> similarity to what I was running (which was gtk). Any hints for a
> non-developer such
> which pcb
>
> will tell you, where the binary is.
Actually, it tells you where the wrapper script is.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Certainly, ldd can tell you, if you can find the pcb
> binary.
which pcb
will tell you, where the binary is.
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lilalaser.de/blog
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seu
> I picked up the rpm that Werner put together a few weeks ago. I
> presume that it is the gtk hid based on where it came from and it's
> similarity to what I was running (which was gtk). Any hints for a
> non-developer such as myself how to tell for sure?
Good question. Certainly, ldd can tel
DJ,I picked up the rpm that Werner put together a few weeks ago. I presume that it is the gtk hid based on where it came from and it's similarity to what I was running (which was gtk). Any hints for a non-developer such as myself how to tell for sure?
Thanks,JoeOn 9/25/06, DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROT
> The grid disappears when I view the back side of the board. Changing the
> grid size, color, or toggling it on and off don't seem to help.
Which hid? Lesstif or gtk?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/m
I don't recall seeing anyone mention this...The grid disappears when I view the back side of the board. Changing the grid size, color, or toggling it on and off don't seem to help.I'm using the 20060822 snapshot under SuSe
9.3Thanks,Joe
___
geda-user
On 9/25/06, Carlos Nieves Ónega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have fixed the CVS version of the symbol according to the changes
posted here. Thanks for the bug report and the bug fix.
Regards,
Carlos
I believe there are few more symbols where the active connection end
is off grid ---
That's great. I'd like to participate, but, unfortunally, I'm too new
to geda and electronics. Maybe next year.
Happy coding for you all.
2006/9/23, Peter Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 15:03 -0400, Patrick Doyle wrote:
> I hope to make it to a gathering and meet all of you
Hi all,
I have fixed the CVS version of the symbol according to the changes
posted here. Thanks for the bug report and the bug fix.
Regards,
Carlos
El sáb, 23-09-2006 a las 22:25 +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
escribió:
> On 9/23/06, John Luciani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Change the
18 matches
Mail list logo
