On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:09:06AM -0800, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
On 10/30/06, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't - the transistor is in a hole in a metal shielding partition, two
legs (G1,G2) on one side and the other two on the other (D, S).
No way to use the metal shielding
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:45:08PM +, Michael Sokolov wrote:
Kai-Martin Knaak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why varicad is the only non open source software on my box.
^^^
So you don't work with FPGAs then, huh? The
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:05:21AM +, Michael Sokolov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ditto for the Xilinx toolchain on my box. At least once you are
registered, get the free-as-in-beer download, Xilinx XST works natively
and without monkeying with license keys.
I've tried it, but
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:15:48PM -0600, John Griessen wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
We run a robot design project,
.
.
.
the desire is (from the project's leader) that the students use gschem
or similar to draw their schematics. We aren't yet at the stage where
these students build
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:21:44PM -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
guile-gtk-2.1-0.31 from http://geda.seul.org/sources.html fails on
OpenBSD 3.9 with
rm -f /usr/local/bin/build-guile-gtk
rm -f /usr/local/bin/guile-gtk
ln /usr/local/bin/build-guile-gtk-1.2
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 23:25, Steve Meier wrote:
I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's
Quantum Theory translated into English in 1930.
Here spontaneuos transitions may occure to the states of negative energy; as
these have never been observed
Perhaps.
[snip]
So it's basically nondeterministic - if it calls make directly then it will
be OpenBSD make, if it goes through the alias mechanism in the shell, then
it will be GNU make. If the make calls itself recursively and has bad luck
it can actually end up calling a different implementation of
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:21:44PM -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
That issue aside, are you using GNU make or OpenBSD's make? I've found
Hard to tell. The make executable is OpenBSD make. The gmake executable
is GNU make. However I made this alias
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
The free download version
of Quartus-II I found seems to need WINE and (no cost) keys.
Can you confirm that, or did I do something wrong?
I'm not using that version, I'm using the native Linux version. You can
I have OpenBSD. Is there also a native OpenBSD version? :)
I will give you all a couple of clues..
The equation garbled as it may be is the more complex version of E = M*C^2
Next go see who received the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1936.
Steve Meier wrote:
I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's Quantum
Theory translated
Steve Meier wrote:
So what was wrong? What occured that proved both theories were correct?
The discovery of the Positron. Seems a bit far removed from EDA, though...
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:25 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's
Quantum Theory translated into English in 1930.
Dirac has set up a wave equation which is valid for one electron
and is
invarient under the Lorentian transformation. It
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Here's a board etched with it:
http://shop.cottagematic.com/elab/etched-board-epson-photo-paper.jpg
This photo was out of focus, but it's easy to see in a bubble tank when
laminate substrate is showing -- copper can still be seen on the bottom
edge.
At 05:25 1-11-2006, you wrote:
I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's
Quantum Theory translated into English in 1930.
Dirac has set up a wave equation which is valid for one electron and is
invarient under the Lorentian transformation. It fulfills all
requirements
John has it correct.
It is facinating reading this text. A modern quantum physics book
presents the theory as cold hard fact... but back in 1930 when it was
brand new Heisenberg was presenting it in an almost appoligetic and not
quite sure manner.
Steve M.
John Doty wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006,
The discovery of the Positron. Seems a bit far removed from EDA, though...
Positrons are only slightly smaller than 01005 capacitors.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't need high complexity circuits, then you can implement things from
medium-scale integrated circuits instead of FPGA, and then you don't have to
use proprietary software :)
Care to implement a Nokia SDSL framer and an ATM TC-PHY in MSI?
Sure why not here is a link to an individual who built a replica of the
Apollo Guidance System, using discrete components and wire wrap, in his
basement.
http://www.spaceref.com/exploration/apollo/acgreplica/
Steve M.
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 17:49 +, Michael Sokolov wrote:
Karel Kulhavy
-
Hello,
which version of guile-gtk is later? 0.5 or 1.2-0.31?
CL
0.5 is the latest. There was also 0.40 between 0.31 and 0.5, so 0.5 shoud be
really 0.50.
Wojciech Kazubski
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
Steve Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure why not here is a link to an individual who built a replica of the
Apollo Guidance System, using discrete components and wire wrap, in his
basement.
Of course a discrete logic wire-wrapped computer is cool. There is no
question on that one. But
Michael,
I am in the same boat as you we also use altera software because our
designs here at MRA Tek are so demanding and complex and need to be in
such a small physical volumn that even if descrete components could
handle the computational speed that we need (which they don't) we
couldn't
On Nov 1, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
But as you said Of course a discrete logic wire-wrapped computer is
cool or a bit nutty but more power to the builder.
It all depends on what you're into. I've been discussing a
project with a friend that would involve building what amounts
It all depends on what you're into. I've been discussing a
project with a friend that would involve building what amounts to a
copy of the PDP-8 (Straight-8, no suffix) with individual
transistors. It's fun, cool, and highly educational in a number of
areas.
Are you going to be true to
Dave -
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:12:49PM -0500, Dave McGuire wrote:
It all depends on what you're into. I've been discussing a
project with a friend that would involve building what amounts to a
copy of the PDP-8 (Straight-8, no suffix) with individual
transistors. It's fun, cool,
On Nov 1, 2006, at 11:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I once personally diagnosed and replaced a blown diode in a PDP-5.
When it blew, it made an accumulator bit stick on, and the machine
became unusable. That event caused the machine to be retired from
the Caltech Cyclotron. My friends and I
25 matches
Mail list logo
