Re: gEDA-user: no pins in JUMPER10

In pcb the components are not connected. :-( 2006/11/6, John Luciani [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 11/6/06, Giorgenes Gelatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got a simpler circuit that is not working. I have snap turned on, but can't see a way of making it works :( What specifically isn't working? the

Re: gEDA-user: no pins in JUMPER10

sure. And I did the disperse all elements too. 2006/11/7, Dan McMahill [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Giorgenes Gelatti wrote: 2006/11/6, John Luciani [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 11/6/06, Giorgenes Gelatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got a simpler circuit that is not working. I have snap turned on, but

Re: gEDA-user: no pins in JUMPER10

On 11/7/06, Giorgenes Gelatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sure. And I did the disperse all elements too. 2006/11/7, Dan McMahill [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Giorgenes Gelatti wrote: 2006/11/6, John Luciani [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 11/6/06, Giorgenes Gelatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got a simpler

RE: gEDA-user: gEDA user with problems

Hi, El vie, 03-11-2006 a las 10:51 -0800, Adrian Nania escribió: Thanks guys for your responses. I will update my small HOWTO. Carlos is telling us: [snip] Nevertheless I tried this with CVS version, and the auto numbering when copying components seems to work for me In that case,

input validation (was: gEDA-user: pcb refdes name restrictions?)

Hi, Moving this thread to geda-dev... El vie, 03-11-2006 a las 12:47 +, Peter Clifton escribió: [snip] Peter B and I were looking at the possibility of introducing some plugable input validation / auto-complete modules into the gschem attribute editing system. The down side of course, is

Re: gEDA-user: about DJ

For a while... Brings back fond memories of compiling my code with PharLap, then with djgpp and getting like 30% better performance with the latter! :-) Moving to GNU toolchain completely right after that and to Linux (Hey, it actually *comes* will all the tools!) around kernel version 0.93.

Re: gEDA-user: smd challenge board status

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:08:04 -0400 DJ Delorie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 29 remain unclaimed. If you've mailed me a check, please email me [not the list] and let me know how many to reserve for you so I don't run out too soon. Also, if you want to pick one up at the next Freedaug meeting,

Re: gEDA-user: furnace controller I/O port again

Thanks Larry. Haven't plucked up the courage to touch a FPGA yet maybe soon. ...thought #1 (possibly a bad one)... What about shifting the bit-banging into a IRQ/timer-driven kernel module that sends smoke signals (not literally...) to user-land when the tx/rx sequence is complete? a bit

Re: gEDA-user: about DJ

I echo this thanks to DJ. You're all welcome :-) I was working on a 386DX/20 running DOS, My first DJGPP machine was one of those (the first DJGPP ran on a 386/16 owned by my employer). I think I still have most of it. DJGPP exists because PharLap didn't support virtual memory.

Re: gEDA-user: smd challenge board status

Was looking at the 01005 caps. I was wondering if that as small as they get, or can they get smaller? Reflow soldering and robotics would odviously be needed. Just Curious. I don't know of anything smaller, and certainly nothing at digikey or mouser is. As for reflow and robotics, they

Re: gEDA-user: furnace controller I/O port again

Greg - On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:42:06PM +1100, Greg Cunningham wrote: What about shifting the bit-banging into a IRQ/timer-driven kernel module that sends smoke signals (not literally...) to user-land when the tx/rx sequence is complete? a bit like a software UART emulation... You still

gEDA-user: SDIP ?

Ok, I ordered a DIP-shaped R8C to experiment with, figuring I could put it in a proto board. Except, it turns out it's an SDIP (0.07 pitch, instead of 0.10 pitch). I get to fab an adapter board. My question is: what's the deal with these? Did we really need something smaller than DIP without