Ales Hvezda wrote:
If you want the specific transistor type to show up in a BOM, then
you probably have to modify the device attribute,
Thanks for clarification. I will change my attribute habits.
---(kaimartin)---
--
Lilalaser tel: +49.511.4850615
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 06:42:45PM -0500, Ales Hvezda wrote:
Hi Karel,
I forgot to tell the licence - the video at
http://ronja.twibright.com/video/gschem.avi
is under GFDL licence.
Neat.
Do you think I should upload it to archive.org?
Seems kinda specific to gEDA
Quick check - are you sure your layer groups have your solder layer
in the solder (bottom) group, and your component layer in the
component (top) group?
Because for me, if I'm looking at the component side (i.e. component
names read normally) and add text to the solder side, the text reads
I do believe for more than 98% of people working with electronic
components it is not possible to install and use the latest gEDA
version. The endless compiling errors and flavor dependencies are
unbelievable. Yeah, we can always google around and after many hard
working weeks have an installation
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Adrian Nania wrote:
I do believe for more than 98% of people working with electronic
components it is not possible to install and use the latest gEDA
version. The endless compiling errors and flavor dependencies are
unbelievable.
Yeah, we can always google around and
On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:43 PM, Adrian Nania wrote:
[snip]
I agree with Ales -- a Windows port would open the floodgates to
hords
of whining clueless fools. Why should we subject ourselves to that?
Supporting the clueful users (and there are quite a few) is already a
big job which we do
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Adrian Nania wrote:
[snip]
I agree with Ales -- a Windows port would open the floodgates to hords
of whining clueless fools. Why should we subject ourselves to that?
Supporting the clueful users (and there are quite a few) is already a
big job which we do exclusively for
Or be prepared to pay my consulting rates.
Do we need a www.gedaconsulting.org ?
:-)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:43 PM, Adrian Nania wrote:
[snip]
I agree with Ales -- a Windows port would open the floodgates to
hords
of whining clueless fools. Why should we subject ourselves to that?
Supporting the clueful users (and there are
On Monday 04 December 2006 19:26, Adrian Nania wrote:
It is possible for some good Samaritan to compile for windows
and make available all the updated gEDA packages?
To answer this, you must understand how the binary packages are
made, and who does them.
Speaking as the creator of gnucap, one
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 14:23, Stuart Brorson wrote:
Or be prepared to pay my consulting rates.
To all reading this .. Please take this as an invitation.
There are no problems, only unmet business opportunities.
One way to increase the priority of any task is to pay for it.
Speaking
It would be great if there was a native Windows port of gEDA.
[.]
Thus you aren't likely to get the
current group to put any effort into a Windows port.
Not unless we are paid handsomely. Of course I speak only for myself
here; if somebody wants to put in all that work for free, they are
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 15:01, Stuart Brorson wrote:
I think RedHat has already cornered that market!
only for IT like stuff, not EDA.
I can see sort of a cooperative business model, where companies
would buy in and fund it in exchange for prioritizing what they
need.
Years ago, all of
Andy Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a) (Most) Hardware guys want to design and implement hardware. Tools
are the means to that end, not the end in itself, and we'd rather do
our work than deal with tool build failures.
I just feel like adding one different data point.
I come into the
This was when I found out
about the real impact of the NGspice licensing problems, which
brings up a serious lesson we all need to learn. I think the
NGspice developers still don't understand what the real problem
was.
Ummm, what is the problem? Is it just the BSD ver. 1 licence thing,
or
Dave McGuire wrote:
None of the hardware people that *I* associate with use Windows. None.
Not chip design folks especially.
John G
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
DJ Delorie wrote:
Or be prepared to pay my consulting rates.
Do we need a www.gedaconsulting.org ?
:-)
No, www.gedaconsulting.com of course!
JG
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
I'll probably just hire someone else to do it once I'm done with the
schematic entry phase and am confident enough in it.
hmm... ask here first ;-)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
al davis wrote:
Another business opportunity is to sell CAD systems, ready to
go, complete with the hardware. Each one is custom.
Considering all of the parts that are available, it seems easy
to do. There are already lots of businesses that do this for
IT applications.
I like this
DJ Delorie wrote:
Or be prepared to pay my consulting rates.
Do we need a www.gedaconsulting.org ?
:-)
Stuart Brorson wrote:
Should I grab the name before some spammer gets it?
Use 1and1.com for $5.99 per year.
John G
happy customer of 1and1.com
Mike Hansen wrote:
You can also install cygwin under windows and install gEDA under
cygwin. I believe there are a multitude of problems with this
arrangement so you will have to check docs.
I could be wrong but I thought things mostly worked there now.
It would be great if there was a
On Dec 5, 2006, at 8:53 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
For a hard-core UNIX programmer like me, the only way to design
hardware
is to make it look like UNIX software: write the source with vi,
keep it
in CVS and compile with make, all in the absence of a graphical
display.
A graphical display
[snip]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, isn't Xantrex some kind of mood drug?
Let's try to keep discussions on geda-* somewhat related to
electronics. Please. Thanks,
-Ales
___
geda-user mailing list
Ales Hvezda wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
It is possible for some good Samaritan to compile for windows and make
available all the updated gEDA packages?
I've had the make the Windows port available discussion many many times
(both virtually and in person). Just this last week I was talking to
DJ Delorie wrote:
Or be prepared to pay my consulting rates.
Do we need a www.gedaconsulting.org ?
I could get behind something like that.
Or rather gedaconsulting.com.
--
Steve WilliamsThe woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com But I have promises to
al davis wrote:
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 14:23, Stuart Brorson wrote:
Or be prepared to pay my consulting rates.
To all reading this .. Please take this as an invitation.
There are no problems, only unmet business opportunities.
One way to increase the priority of any task is to pay
Use 1and1.com for $5.99 per year.
My local isp is $12/year and... local! That's where I get all *my*
domains.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
El vie, 27-10-2006 a las 08:08 -0400, Ales Hvezda escribió:
Hi,
If you have a (component-library ...) line in your local gafrc file
(in $HOME/.gEDA), should that directory be searched before any others
for symbols?
Yes, that is what I expected when I first read your e-mail. But
On Dec 5, 2006, at 3:31 PM, Dan McMahill wrote:
Mike Hansen wrote:
You can also install cygwin under windows and install gEDA under
cygwin. I believe there are a multitude of problems with this
arrangement so you will have to check docs.
I could be wrong but I thought things mostly
Andy Peters wrote:
On Dec 2, 2006, at 4:40 PM, Ales Hvezda wrote:
[snip]
guile-config compile
and
guile-config link
and
guile-config info
I'm guessing that is where the /home/janneke/... is coming from.
Ah, guile-config link and guile-config info both reveal the
/home/janneke/
Hi,
I guess I forgot to mention that some people have very strong opinions
on this very topic.
[snip]
On the other hand, many times we do not have access to a Linux box.
Windows is unfortunately or not the single available desktop in many
places. Now, I do not believe Windows users are jerks.
[snip]
gschem and gnetlist -- should just work under cygwin. If not it should
be pretty easy I'd guess. In terms of a non-cygwin windows version I
gEDA/gaf just works under cygwin thanks to a few dedicated
individuals.
suspect it is basically not hard except for guile. There I
Andy Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While it's not likely a serious PCB editing tool will be text based
(top-shelf PCB layout people have excellent visual and visualization
skills and can do a great job of using the least amount of PCB real-
estate while getting the least-congested
[snip]
Right now I am absolutely thrilled with the quality of the users and
discussions on the mailing lists and I have no intention of crashing a
good thing.
Well, I for one do not use Windows except under duress, but I
think the above sentiment is a tad patronizing. Icarus Verilog
includes
DJ Delorie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll probably just hire someone else to do [layout] once I'm done with the
schematic entry phase and am confident enough in it.
hmm... ask here first ;-)
That's exactly what I was going to do when I'm done with the schematics.
But I need to get all my
Hi Dan,
[snip]
1) I do think it would probably make sense to create a more unified top
level build and top level distfile for gEDA. While there may be some
users who want to install gschem for schematics and only want to use it
for postscript output, most people probably want to install the
-- Free Dog Gathering Announcement
The Free EDA Users Group will meet this coming *Wednesday*, December
6th. As usual, let's meet at the Starbucks across the street from
Quantum Books on Ames St, between Main St and Broadway. It's about 1
block away from the
Stephen Williams wrote:
Ales Hvezda wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
It is possible for some good Samaritan to compile for windows and make
available all the updated gEDA packages?
I've had the make the Windows port available discussion many many times
(both virtually and in person). Just this last
38 matches
Mail list logo
