--- Dan McMahill wrote:
You should be nervous.
Yes, I am. BTW,
Index: parse_y.y
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/pcb/pcb/src/parse_y.y,v
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -U1 -b -r1.40 parse_y.y
--- parse_y.y 21 Apr 2007 21:21:55 -
This isn't the problem I reported a while back is it? Fedora 7 comes
with automake 1.10 and doesn't include aclocal-1.9. Configure apparently
runs ok and you can miss the error message when you run make. I ran
autogen.sh first, and then everything is happy.
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 17:30 +0100,
Robert Butts wrote:
I tell my son the only dumb question is the one never asked. So with
that...
I'm doing an LTSpice simulation and following Stuart's howto. In the
Running LTSpice with gEDA designs step 5 is:
Create a link from your netlist output.net and a netlist in the
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 09:10 -0400, Dennis Veatch wrote:
Ok, at the risk of sounding like a moron. Where would be the download link
for
the project manager, version 1.2.0.20070902 ? The last version I was able to
download was from (that was a while back);
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Dennis Veatch wrote:
On Monday 17 September 2007 09:53:48 am Peter Clifton wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 09:10 -0400, Dennis Veatch wrote:
Ok, at the risk of sounding like a moron. Where would be the download
link for the project manager, version 1.2.0.20070902 ? The last
On Monday 17 September 2007 09:53:48 am Peter Clifton wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 09:10 -0400, Dennis Veatch wrote:
Ok, at the risk of sounding like a moron. Where would be the download
link for the project manager, version 1.2.0.20070902 ? The last version I
was able to download was from
Robert Butts wrote:
When I'm creating the link how do you type the space in the directory
Program Files? See below:
/fake_windows/Program Files/LTC/SwCADIII/MyDesign.cir
Maybe /fake_windows/Program\ Files/LTC/SwCADIII/MyDesign.cir
JG
--
Ecosensory Austin TX
tinyOS devel on: ubuntu
Hi Peter and all,
I just git cloned the repo and read the README file.
It says to do:
./configure make install
It looks like there is no file named configure in the repository.
Is this because it is mentioned in the .gitignore file ?
How to go further on xgsch2pcb ?
Kind regards,
Bert
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 19:15 +0200, Bert Timmerman wrote:
Hi Peter and all,
I just git cloned the repo and read the README file.
It says to do:
./configure make install
It looks like there is no file named configure in the repository.
Is this because it is mentioned in the
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 18:31 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 19:15 +0200, Bert Timmerman wrote:
Hi Peter and all,
I just git cloned the repo and read the README file.
I've just pushed a small update to the README file which describes the
necessary step to recreate the
I use the keystone test points as well, the loops make grabbing on
with test leads a snap.
a small surface mount pad that is a test point for minimal testing or
other stuff is good as well, especially if you want to make a bead of
nails testing jig.
Steve
On Sep 16, 2007, at 4:33 PM,
Dobry den,
tento mail vam poslal pocitac, pretoze ste sa pokusili poslat
mi prilis velku prilohu. Zial, take velke prilohy sa do mojej
schranky nezmestia. Poslite, prosim, mail znova bez prilohy a
prilohu ulozte na verejnom ulozisku, napriklad
http://www.yousendit.com/
alebo
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 13:54 -0500, Ed Angie S. wrote:
Peter,
Thanks for the reply.
My initial email was lacking that I am trying to install from the gEDA
20070221 CD. My new Ubuntu machine will be my second gEDA installation and
I would like it to be the same version of gEDA as my
Peter,
Thanks for the quick response.
1. Is it ok to have both libgtk2.0-dev and libgtk1.2-dev installed?
2. You are correct, g++ is not installed but will be shortly.
3. I will install libgd2-xpm-dev
Ed
- Original Message -
From: Peter Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gEDA user
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 14:38 -0500, Ed Angie S. wrote:
Peter,
Thanks for the quick response.
1. Is it ok to have both libgtk2.0-dev and libgtk1.2-dev installed?
Should be fine. I don't have, but the libraries are versioned such that
they won't clash.
2. You are correct, g++ is not
Dan McMahill wrote:
Robert Butts w
BTW, why LTspice and not ng-spice or gnucap which are both open source?
With either of them, you can avoid tying yourself to a particular OS,
they both have mailing lists with not just users but program developers,
and you have more of an ability to
gene wrote:
Dan McMahill wrote:
Robert Butts w
BTW, why LTspice and not ng-spice or gnucap which are both open
source? With either of them, you can avoid tying yourself to a
particular OS, they both have mailing lists with not just users but
program developers, and you have more of an
On Monday 17 September 2007, Dan McMahill wrote:
I'd comment, but I probably can't give a good measure of the
learning curve. From my perspective, if you've used any
circuit simulators, ngspice and gnucap are both pretty easy.
But then again I first used spice nearly 2 decades ago and
use
18 matches
Mail list logo
