On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 00:23 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> PS: The attributes of single pins still behave differently when the pin
> is rotated. Any chance, that this bug receives attention?
Do you have attribute auto-placement turned on in any of your config
files?
--
Peter Clifton
Elect
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:51:58 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> I have rotated capacitor-1.sym with visible C? text. Then I added
> attribute value=100p with has alignment mark at lower left by default.
> But alignment of C? is wrong --
gschem does indeed manipulate the alignment of rotated text.
This question has come up in the past. Dig back in the archives and
look for a posting from David Rowe. He generated a script which can do
footprint replacement in certain situations. It may be available from
his web site. I have used it with success with a number of surface
mount footprin
On Oct 12, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Randall Nortman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:48:12AM -0600, John Doty wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 12, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Randall Nortman wrote:
>>
>>> So I have a 42VDC supply that I want to feed into a linear
>>> regulator.
>>> But almost all linear regulators want
> So why not use a standard-issue three-terminal adjustable regulator
> circuit? Those things don't care what Vin is, only Vin-Vout.
If your Vo is driving a big cap you'll end up with vin = unloaded input
voltage and Vo=0V at turn-on. This could exceed max ratings at a bad time
which is at max
Peter Clifton wrote:
> There are a few other ideas we can borrow from music playing software,
> like the ability to rate symbols / footprints. Translated to EDA.. this
> mean marking the symbol / footprint as being correct, and manufacturable
> through your experience using it.
Yes, good emphasis
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:48:12AM -0600, John Doty wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Randall Nortman wrote:
>
> > So I have a 42VDC supply that I want to feed into a linear regulator.
> > But almost all linear regulators want 40V absolute maximum, and the
> > ones that have higher maximums
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:46:16AM -0400, John Luciani wrote:
> There may be a TL431 application circuit that could be work. Check out
> the TL431 datasheet from TI.
Well, I think you've fixed my problem, but it doesn't involve the
TL431. But the datasheet inspired me -- I see them using it to
co
build from cvs source doesnot make any problem.
2007/10/12, Hyunwoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> hi again.
>
> I did "file" -> "revert" as DJ Delorie recommended. after that,
> "Flood-comp" layer looks diferent depending on screen zoom. and, some more
> explorer of surface with right mouse butto
On Oct 12, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Randall Nortman wrote:
> So I have a 42VDC supply that I want to feed into a linear regulator.
> But almost all linear regulators want 40V absolute maximum, and the
> ones that have higher maximums are not reliably stocked anywhere.
What's wrong with an LM317HV?
htt
Stuart Brorson wrote:
> Naw. I object to any fix which makes the windows dance, even on only
> some machines. The reason is that dancing windows make it look like
> the software is flakey, and will lead to complaints and bad reviews
> from newbies and those who base their judgements on superific
I think that the position of the alignment mark of text attributes of
gschem is wrong after rotation of the object (and text attribute).
I have rotated capacitor-1.sym with visible C? text. Then I added
attribute value=100p with has alignment mark at lower left by default.
But alignment of C? is w
There may be a TL431 application circuit that could be work. Check out
the TL431 datasheet from TI.
(* jcl *)
--
http://www.luciani.org
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
So I have a 42VDC supply that I want to feed into a linear regulator.
But almost all linear regulators want 40V absolute maximum, and the
ones that have higher maximums are not reliably stocked anywhere. So
I need to drop that down by at least 5V or so. The good news is that
I'm only pulling arou
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:15:54 -0700, Steven Michalske wrote:
> I have seen this FEATURE hit many times before by different users,
Me too. Very annoying.
Traditionally, hyphens are considered safe characters in file names. So
it took me quite some time to track down what triggered trouble. I'd
co
15 matches
Mail list logo
