gEDA-user: Attributes in pcb footprint files -- is this a new feature?

There are a few footprints at gedasymbols.org like Element[90551 110236 0 0 0 100 ] ( Pin[0 0 5300 2000 5900 2400 1 edge2] Pin[19213 0 5300 2000 5900 2400 2 edge2] ElementLine [-12992 -5512 -12992 5512 1000] ElementLine [-9055 9449 27953 9449 1000]

Re: gEDA-user: Icarus Verilog vvp32 on 64bit systems

Stephen Williams wrote: Question: Does *anybody* use or even see value in the 32bit runtime support that Icarus Verilog includes in 64bit builds? In particular, there is support in the Icarus Verilog source for building simultaneously a vvp (64bit) and a vvp32 (32bit) to support 32bit VPI's

Re: gEDA-user: Icarus Verilog vvp32 on 64bit systems

Günter Dannoritzer wrote: Stephen Williams wrote: Question: Does *anybody* use or even see value in the 32bit runtime support that Icarus Verilog includes in 64bit builds? In particular, there is support in the Icarus Verilog source for building simultaneously a vvp (64bit) and a vvp32

Re: gEDA-user: Icarus Verilog issues with Teal

Stephen Williams wrote: Günter Dannoritzer wrote: Hi, I am looking into using Icarus Verilog with Teal/Truss, a C++ based verification framework. With Icarus 0.8.6 all tests but the last, with release of a_wire, are working. It's probably a matter of it not being implemented yet. Looks

Re: gEDA-user: Icarus Verilog issues with Teal

On Jan 25, 2008 7:38 AM, Günter Dannoritzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I will be honest with you. Trying to figure out truss/teal I am still finding some other problems of the software itself that makes me not succeed using it. So for now I can live with using it with the stable version of

Re: gEDA-user: Attributes in pcb footprint files -- is this a new feature?

I have newer seen these Attribute() entries before -- is this new and is there documentation about it? I put support in for that a while back... August 2006. It's documented in the usual pcb documentation. You can put attributes at board-level too.