gEDA-user: Running the Verilog netlister

Hello, I am trying to run the Verilog netlister and end up with the following error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/04_Work/a-Link3_TC2/13_gEDA_Schematics_cut gnetlist -g verilog 15_Logic_01.sch gEDA/gnetlist version 1.4.0.20080127 Loading schematic

Re: gEDA-user: Success with gEDA tools...

Anyone figured out the best way to ungunk the tweezers? Although, in my frustration I discovered a new way of implementing flying capacitors... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Jackson Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 23:36 To: gEDA user

Re: gEDA-user: Running the Verilog netlister

On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 09:16 +0200, Peter Kaiser wrote: Hello, I am trying to run the Verilog netlister and end up with the following error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/04_Work/a-Link3_TC2/13_gEDA_Schematics_cut gnetlist -g verilog 15_Logic_01.sch gEDA/gnetlist version

Re: gEDA-user: Hierarchial refdes vs. board assembler

On Thursday 17 July 2008 11:32:16 pm Steve Meier wrote: This process as written below should be captured into the geda wiki. Maybe I should clean it up and send it to Circuit Cellar? I do think the cost of the components is a hudge cost driver for a pcb assembly! Of course the price of the

gEDA-user: tragesym - how to generate netnames?

Hello! After I edited the template.src and added some netnames to some pins too, I run tragesym and get the symbol.sch. When I opened it with gschem, I don't see any netnames there, even when I hit 'en' or 'ee' on selected pin. Why is there in template.src in the [pins] table the 'net' column

gEDA-user: What to do w/ unused pins when creating a symbol

I'm creating a symbol for a chip that has pins not used, labeled n.c. and not internally connected. Should I just omit these pins from the symbol? ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org

Re: gEDA-user: What to do w/ unused pins when creating a symbol

I'm creating a symbol for a chip that has pins not used, labeled n.c. and not internally connected. Should I just omit these pins from the symbol? That's what I do. djboxsym even has a section for them, so it can tell you if any pins are missing.

Re: gEDA-user: Success with gEDA tools...

I use 91% isopropyl alcohol...works great for me. -Dave On Jul 19, 2008, at 3:38 AM, James Johnston wrote: Anyone figured out the best way to ungunk the tweezers? Although, in my frustration I discovered a new way of implementing flying capacitors... -Original

Re: gEDA-user: Success with gEDA tools...

On Saturday 19 July 2008 03:38:37 am James Johnston wrote: Anyone figured out the best way to ungunk the tweezers? I use an old 5.25 floppy Bulk Eraser to demagnetize mine when things start sticking to them, even when they are clean. ___ geda-user

gEDA-user: Making PCB parts

Hi There, I am try to make new parts, no problem to make parts for schematic but make footprint, it is not an easy task. I start making a simple PC transformer and few other parts, completed the layout and saved. At this point Iran the gsch2pcb which generate the pcb file OK so far, I loaded the

gEDA-user: Nvidia-glx-new

E: nvidia-glx-new: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2 Hi, whenever I try to apt-get a dependency for pcb I get this message from the package manager. Is it important? Regards Ian. ___ geda-user mailing list

Re: gEDA-user: Nvidia-glx-new

On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 16:34 -0400, Ian Chapman wrote: E: nvidia-glx-new: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2 Hi, whenever I try to apt-get a dependency for pcb I get this message from the package manager. Is it important? Regards Ian. No idea, but its not related to