How do I connect a gnucap internal capacitor model to this netlist generated by
gnetlist -g verilog?
/* structural Verilog generated by gnetlist */
/* WARNING: This is a generated file, edits */
/*made here will be lost next time */
/*you run gnetlist! */
/* Id
I tried making a pcb using Direct Etch's TTS. The problem I ran into
was that the entire layout didn't transfer to the copper.
I printed the layout to the TTS paper back in November and for various
reasons wasn't able to try making the board till yesturday. Could
that have
99% of TT problems are these two:
1. The board wasn't clean enough.
2. The heat applied was too little, or too much.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Hi,
during the past month I've drawed several circuit diagrams with gschem
and drew the missed symbols.
I'd like now someone to check them and maybe to upload them (or some of
them) to gedasymbols.org so others would benefit too.
I've uploaded them here:
http://files.pofo.de/symbols/
Please
Rob Butts wrote:
We used a scrub sponge with dishwashing
soap for the copper.
I recommend abrasive cleaner -- I use bar keeper's friend since it has acid in
it too.
Just prior to that the board was cleaned with
acitone.
I only bother with strong solvent if I am cleaning off a bad
On Jan 25, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Tamas Szabo wrote:
Hi All,
I need to design a circuit where in some cases a pull-up resistor in
other cases a pull-down one is necessary.
I have two questions:
- can I specify attribute 'not mounted'?
- can I see those parts in the BOM file?
I'm pretty
Thank you for the exhaustive answer!
/sza2
John Doty wrote:
No, but there are lots of ways to do this. In some designs, I have a
gain adjustment resistor. In most cases it should be left out, so it
has value=omit. Something like value=330, not mounted is
perfectly legal from the
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:24:54 +0100, Tamas Szabo wrote:
I have two questions:
- can I specify attribute 'not mounted'?
- can I see those parts in the BOM file?
Is there a convention for this?
At my former day job we put the value in parenthesis to indicate the
component should be omitted.
gamin even claims to not be portable.
this sounds like we will need to use the OS X native fsevents
It looks like your using python so, these events are contained in
pyObjC 2.0, and it's Included in Leopard!
Hardkrash
On Jan 23, 2009, at 6:06 PM, Ales Hvezda wrote:
[[ I'm forwarding this
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 15:59 -0800, Steven Michalske wrote:
gamin even claims to not be portable.
this sounds like we will need to use the OS X native fsevents
In a truly ideal world, (assuming no one is working on it already),
coding an OS X backend for gamin would probably be the best way.
Am Sonntag, den 25.01.2009, 18:41 +0100 schrieb Oliver Lehmann:
Hi,
during the past month I've drawed several circuit diagrams with gschem
and drew the missed symbols.
I'd like now someone to check them and maybe to upload them (or some of
them) to gedasymbols.org so others would benefit
While trying to fix another problem, I reinstalled gschem and gEDA on my
Debian Linux system. /etc/gEDA/system-gafrc went poof, never to be seen
again. How do I get it back. I'm running 1;1.4.0-2 on Lenny.
Gary Roach
___
geda-user mailing list
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 17:21 -0800, Gary L. Roach wrote:
While trying to fix another problem, I reinstalled gschem and gEDA on my
Debian Linux system. /etc/gEDA/system-gafrc went poof, never to be seen
again. How do I get it back. I'm running 1;1.4.0-2 on Lenny.
I presume by reinstalled, you
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:32:18AM +, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 17:21 -0800, Gary L. Roach wrote:
[chop] I'm running 1;1.4.0-2 on Lenny.
I presume by reinstalled, you mean that you re-installed the debian
package, not installed from source. [chop]
Speaking of
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 19:27 -0800, Larry Doolittle wrote:
Speaking of Debian/Lenny/gEDA, can someone turn up the heat
on getting a license-fixed (at least) geda into Debian?
The time is fast approaching when packages with RC bugs
will get kicked out.
People are on the case.. don't worry.
On the dev list (where I am not allowed to post anymore), Peter C
complains about the trouble it takes to do special things with GTK:
I'm already at +740 lines of code _just_ to get multi-letter
accelerators _DRAWN_ on menu items.
IMHO, this simply means, gschem is way off the rails here. I
I never experienced multi letter menus with any other app. This is
very much non standard.
The ideal would be to support the standard accelerators (like Ctrl-C
for Copy, etc) as well as two-key ones (like E E) for actions that
don't map easily to gtk standard actions. Non-modified keys are
Stefan Salewski wrote:
Copyright and documentation attributes is missing.
Hm when I used the template-conversion tool it complained about copyright
is not a valid attribute.
Regarding documentation - is it allowed to have alldatasheets.org (for
example) links? I've tried to find official links
On Jan 25, 2009, at 10:10 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
The ideal would be to support the standard accelerators (like Ctrl-C
for Copy, etc) as well as two-key ones (like E E) for actions that
don't map easily to gtk standard actions. Non-modified keys are
normally not used as accelerators in
On Monday 26 January 2009 05:38:25 Eric Brombaugh wrote:
Getting rid of the 'f s' sequence in gschem (or at least providing an
alternative) would go a long way toward alleviating some of my mis-
keys. The number of times I've turned my PCB layouts green as a result
of using the gschem file
20 matches
Mail list logo
