On Wednesday 10 June 2009 00:29:04 Mark Rages wrote:
my reinvented wheel:
http://vivara.net/software/gschem-resize.py
of course, I think it's more readable.
You owe me a new brain. I broke the last one trying to read that. :-/
Peter
--
Peter Brett
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Kai-Martin Knaakk...@familieknaak.de wrote:
Avoid small tips. Soldering is so much easier if the tip is short and
broad. Its all about heat flow. A small tip has a hard time to heat a pad
connected to a ground plane. Use the largest tip that fits between the
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Peter Cliftonpc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:16 -0500, Mark Rages wrote:
If a line is selected, a square-shaped handle appears on each end.
However, when I zoom in these handles become bigger. This defeats the
point of zooming in, because it
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 21:51 -0400, Mark wrote:
Sooo... It looks really smooth. I like it a lot. I'll try to give it a run
for the money tomorrow afternoon and will let you know if I find anything.
Thanks. Testing is, as always, appreciated. The main known bug is some
issues with tab
However, when properly used, rich text enhances email messages
significantly, increasing clarity and visual appeal of a message.
Even if true, what does that have to do with the list? Do you believe
it is possible to use RTF properly in email between people who have
no prior arrangement?
Hi,
I'm about to create footprint for bridge recfilter in wob package.
It's the rounded one with four pins, see for example
http://www.a1parts.com/Diodes/wob_package_silicon_passivated_b.htm
The problem is pin numbering, there doesn't seem to be any standart
pin numbering for wob package (after
I got tired of not knowing which version of PCB I was using.
linux guys, add your own real name detection :-)
0001-Adding-build-info-to-about-box.patch
Description: Binary data
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Jun 10, 2009, at 1:53 AM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Can someone recommend the easiest
solder to work with (% lead,
No lead.
*PUKE*
I've stocked up on real solder. The unleaded crap sucks.
I've found SnAgCu0.7 as easy for hand soldering as the Sn60Pb I
used before.
Hmm,
Well said. Tiny tips and tiny solder are the wrong approach.
Of course, size is relative. 0.020 solder and 0.020 tip come in
handy when soldering 0201 or 0402 parts, or trying to fix a single pin
on 0.5mm pitch.
___
geda-user mailing list
Also, the discussion was about HTML, not RTF.
Rich text is a generic term. HTML provides rich text. RTF also
provides rich text.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
1. Requiring GIT for everyone building pcb sounds extreme; could we
auto-detect whether GIT is available?
2. Building buildInfo.h *every* time is bad. It should only be built
if there's some other reason to build pcb (i.e. the commands should
go in with the link commands)
3. For
Rob Butts wrote:
I'm getting some components on digikey and I also want to get some
supplies to prototype some home-made circuit boards. I haven't done
tech work in years and have a new aide who hasn't done much soldering
at all. I want to get solder but want to get what's
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 01:11:49PM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
The problem is pin numbering,
All I'll say is that the 4 pin ones are the hardest. I made a board with
several hundred+ pin packages where I made the symbols and footprints.
And I made a fancy 4-pad footprint that would accept
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:30:40 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
Sorry, I nuked support for that scaling command - since the correct
default to match on-screen and printed are hard-coded in that branch.
Ok.
There was a wart showing up at this occasion. gschem silently quit
reading the resource file
Since DJ mentioned impedance level concerns associated with different kinds
of flux: please note that the flux pen shown in John Luciani's generally
excellent recommendations leads to seriously low electrical conductivity.
[At least for high-impedance analog circuits].
It's a pretty aggressive
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Frank Milesf...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Since DJ mentioned impedance level concerns associated with different kinds
of flux: please note that the flux pen shown in John Luciani's generally
excellent recommendations leads to seriously low electrical
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:36:57 -0500, Mark Rages wrote:
I'm not resizing a whole schematic, just assembling one of those
mini-schematics-within-a-symbol.
This is cool.
So you not only shrink but also turn wires into pure graphic. It would
make for a valuable plug-in. :-)
---(kaimartin)---
--
On Tue, 26 May 2009 02:14:58 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
What version of gschem is it based on?
My cairo branch, + some local stuff. It should apply to git HEAD though
(untested).
I tried to apply the patch to your cairo branch (git checkout -b
cairo_experiment origin/cairo_experiment).
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:20:30 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Also, the discussion was about HTML, not RTF.
Rich text is a generic term. HTML provides rich text. RTF also
provides rich text.
I like to read the mailinglist with a Usenet client via gmane because of
better threading. So I wouldn't
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:58:38 -0500, Mark Rages wrote:
Before: http://vivara.net/images/huge_grips.png After:
http://vivara.net/images/smaller_grips.png
This small change is a big usability improvement for me.
I'll second that. The whole concept of scaling handles is a pain. They
should
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:53:35 +0200, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
I've found SnAgCu0.7 as easy for hand soldering as the Sn60Pb I used
before.
I agree, that an experienced hand tends to find no much difference.
However, this is the kind of solder that made some of my colleagues
boykott the
On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
I've found SnAgCu0.7 as easy for hand soldering as the Sn60Pb I used
before.
I agree, that an experienced hand tends to find no much difference.
However, this is the kind of solder that made some of my colleagues
boykott the mandatory use
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:35:01PM -0400, John Luciani wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Frank Milesf...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Since DJ mentioned impedance level concerns associated with different kinds
of flux: please note that the flux pen shown in John Luciani's generally
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 03:44:26PM -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
I've been soldering for 33 years now, no inexperienced hands
here. The Pb-free stuff I've tried has just plain sucked. I will
try the stuff Philipp mentioned though.
If you've got a nice Metcal you may find that their
On Jun 10, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Ben Jackson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 03:44:26PM -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
I've been soldering for 33 years now, no inexperienced hands
here. The Pb-free stuff I've tried has just plain sucked. I will
try the stuff Philipp mentioned though.
If
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:30 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
1. Requiring GIT for everyone building pcb sounds extreme; could we
auto-detect whether GIT is available?
It should auto detect git.
It was late but the second case statement was for when git was not
present. to fall back on OS based methods
Because of the way that the scripts runs, if git is not present the
#defines for git are not created, so the git based lines are not
included sources, through the ifdefs.
Right, but whoever's making the distribution should have git...
___
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:21 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:30:40 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
Sorry, I nuked support for that scaling command - since the correct
default to match on-screen and printed are hard-coded in that branch.
Ok.
There was a wart showing up
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 19:04 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009 02:14:58 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
What version of gschem is it based on?
My cairo branch, + some local stuff. It should apply to git HEAD though
(untested).
I tried to apply the patch to your cairo
On Wed June 10 2009 05:46:43 am Peter Clifton wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 21:51 -0400, Mark wrote:
Sooo... It looks really smooth. I like it a lot. I'll try to give it a
run for the money tomorrow afternoon and will let you know if I find
anything.
Thanks. Testing is, as always,
I am wondering if the RESC1608L pad length is correct. The difference
between the RESC1608L and CAPC1608L is apx 30%. The difference between
RESC2012L and CAPC2012L is about 10%. I have not looked at heights or
calculated the values using the IPC-7351 equations. The RESC1608L
pads look very narrow
Mark Rages wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Stefan Salewskim...@ssalewski.de wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 17:47 -0500, Mark Rages wrote:
Before I write a script to do it: is there an easy or gui way to scale
/ resize a gschem symbol?
Regards,
Mark
markra...@gmail
Resizing symbols is
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:33:08 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
I doubt it quit reading the rc file silently, something should have
shown up in the log - or on stdout. Did you see anything like that?
Like I said, there was a note in the status window:
/--
In unknown file:
?: 0*
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:35:32 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
New patch against latest code is attached.
Basically just add a toplevel as the first parameter to
s_page_append()
(snip)
---
gschem/src/o_move.c | 15 +++ 1 files changed, 15
insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
34 matches
Mail list logo
