On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 07:09 +, Ineiev wrote:
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 Peter Clifton pc...@x:
* Subject: Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA-cvs: pcb.git: branch: master updated
commit 149ff2e16560e85e2f060c89020da121eb83f1b6
Author: Ineiev ine...@
Commit: DJ Delorie d...@xxx
Karl Hammar:
...
make[1]: MKDIR_P@: Command not found
make[1]: *** [../../.desktop-i18n] Error 127
...
Ok, seems to be an bug in autoconf/automake [1], where
the author says that autoconf 2.61 and automake 1.9 is a bad
combination.
Using automake 1.10.1 does not help as seen in previous
Make failure:
$ make
...
Making all in scheme
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/karl/Net/git/gaf/gnetlist/scheme'
if test . != ; then \
echo copying scheme files ; \
cp -f ./*.scm ; \
else \
echo source directory = build
Hi,
I've been looking at geda as a replacment to Eagle, as I want to use a
fully open source tools flow. I've got a couple of questions I hope you
guys can answer.
I use Ubuntu which has gschem 1.4. So I've downloaded the newest code
with git and compiled it. Given that there seems to be
This is true, the proper way was to fix the leaks in one patch and
introduce layer attributes in a subsequent one; however, DJ asked
about single patch, and I didn't want to add _buggy_ support for
layer attributes; nonetheless, I explained how to get even that
buggy support.
I'm not going
I'm having trouble finding the correct footprint names for
components. Is there a list of footprints. Would it be possible to
add a dropdown list of footprint names for a selected component in
the component attributes dialog.
What most people do is leave PCB up and running; PCB has its own
Kelvin Gardiner wrote:
I use Ubuntu which has gschem 1.4. So I've downloaded the newest code
with git and compiled it. Given that there seems to be quite few changes
is there any plans to build a 1.6 Ubuntu package either for relase in
the Ubuntu repos or via a PPA.
Hi Kevin,
Please
On Monday 02 November 2009 16:48:12 Karl Hammar wrote:
Since builddir is not defined anywhere in the Makefile, the above
fails.
What should the value of builddir be?
(info (autoconf) Preset Output Variables) sayeth:
-- Variable: builddir
Rigorously equal to `.'. Added for symmetry
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 17:04 +, Kelvin Gardiner wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at geda as a replacment to Eagle, as I want to use a
fully open source tools flow. I've got a couple of questions I hope you
guys can answer.
I use Ubuntu which has gschem 1.4. So I've downloaded the newest
On Monday 02 November 2009 16:20:16 Karl Hammar wrote:
Karl Hammar:
...
make[1]: MKDIR_P@: Command not found
make[1]: *** [../../.desktop-i18n] Error 127
...
Ok, seems to be an bug in autoconf/automake [1], where
the author says that autoconf 2.61 and automake 1.9 is a bad
Peter TB Brett:
...
[pe...@harrington gaf (master)]$ automake --version | head -n1
automake (GNU automake) 1.11
Ergo, your automake is generating garbage output. Unbreak it and try again?
This is probably the root cause of many of the problems you seem to have been
having in the last
R. Bosch wrote:
B.t.w.: Just noticed that it's almost a year since 20081128 was
released. Any idea why it never came in Ubuntu? Which is still at
20080202... :-/
Hmm, Ubuntu Jaunty is at:
gEDA/gschem version 1.4.3.20081231
Be nice if 1.6 was there, but it's not as bad as you say.
--
John P. Doty wrote:
R. Bosch wrote:
B.t.w.: Just noticed that it's almost a year since 20081128 was
released. Any idea why it never came in Ubuntu? Which is still at
20080202... :-/
Hmm, Ubuntu Jaunty is at:
gEDA/gschem version 1.4.3.20081231
Be nice if 1.6 was there, but
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 22:52 +0100, R. Bosch wrote:
John P. Doty wrote:
R. Bosch wrote:
B.t.w.: Just noticed that it's almost a year since 20081128 was
released. Any idea why it never came in Ubuntu? Which is still at
20080202... :-/
Hmm, Ubuntu Jaunty is at:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 19:35 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
This is one of the little usability issues that might make a difference:
I seem to do much copy-paste during schematic capture. Currently symbols
are copied as is. The result in double refdes numbers which have to be
fixed
DJ -
I've noticed a little change in the version of Pcb that I compiled after
pulling the code from the repository on 10/21 – the details:
1. I have a number of self-written footprints in the
directory /usr/share/pcb/newlib/local
2. The directory is owned by root,
Did you set the path to the directory with the footprints, or its
parent directory?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Mon November 2 2009 05:15:09 am Peter Clifton wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 18:14 -0500, Mark wrote:
How different are Ubuntu's libraries (packages) compared to the bone
stock ones straight from the project developers? I'm not certain they
would really work on Slackware.
I'm not
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:17:04 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
I use the attached. I wrote it as a little example for someone (can't
recall who), and ended up using it.
Dump it in ~/.gEDA/ and add the following to your gafrc, adjusting paths
as necessary:
Tried it, but it doesn't seem to change
On Monday 02 November 2009 20:10:15 Karl Hammar wrote:
$ ./autogen.sh
checking for ./configure.ac ... yes
...
libgeda/docs/images/Makefile.am:24: `%'-style pattern rules are a GNU
make extension libgeda/docs/images/Makefile.am:27: `%'-style pattern rules
are a GNU make extension
20 matches
Mail list logo
