On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:32 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
> I understand, that you are weary to remove the CRASH statement when not 100%
> sure what it's purpose in this particular case is. But is this a valid
> reason to withhold a working patch and keep printing from the command line
> in a cripp
I just did a fresh clone of pcb head from git and did the usual combo of
autogen, configure and make install ("git fetch" on my old copy failed to
compile). All went well with the freshly downloaded version.
However, when I tried to print from the command line I got a familiar error
message:
Thanks!
That makes a lot of sense. I think I will do that, too.
By the way, what does the ':' character mean then?
The short tutorial used it (though only ":1") and I naively assumed
that's how people usually create buses.
Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:05:43 -0700
Matthe
3 matches
Mail list logo