I'm having difficulty getting the new Import Schematic function in PCB
working. I've set import::mode attribute to gnetlist and
import:sch0 to my schematic filename. Running :Import() appears to
do nothing, and the message log says
Can't add rat lines because no netlist is loaded.
What am I
On 26 June 2010 11:17, Gareth Edwards gar...@edwardsfamily.org.uk wrote:
I'm having difficulty getting the new Import Schematic function in PCB
working. I've set import::mode attribute to gnetlist and
import:sch0 to my schematic filename. Running :Import() appears to
do nothing, and the
Hello all:
Anyone has think about to port the Geda-tools to Android/Maemo/Meego
platforms?
With the avalanche of devices (now and in future) using this types of
Linux s.o., I think that should be a great speedway to atract more
users/devolopers and impulse this great suite.
Furthermore, I
can anyone recommend a viewer for these drawings?
gene
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On 26 June 2010 11:22, Gareth Edwards gar...@edwardsfamily.org.uk wrote:
On 26 June 2010 11:17, Gareth Edwards gar...@edwardsfamily.org.uk wrote:
I'm having difficulty getting the new Import Schematic function in PCB
working. I've set import::mode attribute to gnetlist and
import:sch0 to my
Hello Gareth,
Gareth Edwards writes:
[...]
More data from the console:
Failed to read pcbfwd scm file
[/home/gareth/geda/share/gEDA/scheme/gnet-pcbfwd.scm]
[...]
I'm thinking my non-standard install location may have thrown the PCB
installer off-kilter - I'll have a dig.
Indeed
On 26 June 2010 13:38, Gareth Edwards gar...@edwardsfamily.org.uk wrote:
The autotools setup for gaf allows the PCB install directory to be
specified on the ./configure command line - is it arguable that the
setup for PCB should allow the gaf install directory to be specified
on the
Note that it's src0, not sch0, to name the input files.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
A random thought occurred to me today - why does gschem do slotting at
all? Why does it care about footprints and packages? Would it make
more sense, from a design flow perspective, to just send the symbolic
information to pcb and let pcb assign footprints and pinouts?
That way, gschem does
On 26 June 2010 17:49, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
Note that it's src0, not sch0, to name the input files.
Oops, error in transcription to email - I had it right in the board file.
Cheers
Gareth
___
geda-user mailing list
DJ Delorie wrote:
A random thought occurred to me today - why does gschem do slotting at
all? Why does it care about footprints and packages?
It is not only pcb that reads the schematic, but humans, too. During
debugging I need to know which pins to poke my probe at. This is only
On Jun 26, 2010, at 11:18 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
A random thought occurred to me today - why does gschem do slotting at
all? Why does it care about footprints and packages?
There's no reason for it to. There's not even any reason to select part values.
Putting these things into source
can anyone recommend a viewer for these drawings?
You can use AutoDesk's free DWG viewer,
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/pc/index?id=6703438siteID=123112
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
DJ Delorie wrote:
Probably make power pin
management more complex too
DJ, this reminds me of a set of improvements I'd throw into the ring
because if PCB knew which nets were power nets, and so forth as provided
by gschem it'd be the beginning of categorization or even
hierarchicalization
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 13:18 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
A random thought occurred to me today - why does gschem do slotting at
all? Why does it care about footprints and packages? Would it make
more sense, from a design flow perspective, to just send the symbolic
information to pcb and let pcb
John Doty wrote:
On Jun 26, 2010, at 11:18 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
A random thought occurred to me today - why does gschem do slotting at all?
Why does it care about footprints and packages?
There's no reason for it to. There's not even any reason to select part values.
Putting these
In viewing the gerbv warning for a small set of gbr's (made with PCB)
I'm getting a an Undefined aperture number called out in D code
warning message.
I can narrow it down to no-plate mounting hole. While I assumed it was
the no-plate that caused the blip, it's actually something with the
Stefan Salewski wrote:
On the other hand: I think symbols really should have information about
footprints. Consider making a schematic with 100 symbols. Do we want to
select a footprint for each of these in PCB. And again for the next pcb,
with a similar schematic.
ack.
Maybe, symbols
Hello all,
Has anybody got a footprint for a SD card, not mini or micro.
This has been asked in the past but the person with the required
footprint was on geocities which is now defunkt.
This was from google:
DJ Delorie wrote:
Anyone done any sd-card designs? Looking for
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:15 PM, billium bill...@bucknall.me.uk wrote:
Has anybody got a footprint for a SD card, not mini or micro.
This has been asked in the past but the person with the required
footprint was on geocities which is now defunkt.
You can download sdCardExample.tgz from
20 matches
Mail list logo
