Robert Spanton:
I'm a European under the age of 40, and as such my brain works in
metric. So I'll write footprints for PCB in metric, then do the
conversion over to those weird units as a last step. So I banged the
attached script together. This replaces all instances of Nmm (e.g.
Best would be if pcb could parse these mm's on input.
It does.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
DJ:
Best would be if pcb could parse these mm's on input.
It does.
Great!!, but how?
I cannot see any reference of mm for the file format in doc/pcb.pdf
I can see that there should be some support:
$ grep FLOATINGMM src/parse_l.l
FLOATINGMM {FLOATING}[mM][mM]
{FLOATINGMM}
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 19:10 +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
DJ:
Best would be if pcb could parse these mm's on input.
It does.
Great!!, but how?
I cannot see any reference of mm for the file format in doc/pcb.pdf
I can see that there should be some support:
$ grep FLOATINGMM
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 20:31 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
Yes, this is how it should work, as DJ told us, in this thread again.
Works fine for 2009 PCB snapshot shipped with Gentoo-Linux. If I
remember correctly, this syntax was introduced about two years ago, so
2007 snapshot and earlier
I really think it is too large in printout.
You may compare a recent printout from gEDA 1.6.1 at
http://www.ssalewski.de/tmp/AmplifierCh1.pdf
with old 1.4.3 printout at
http://www.ssalewski.de/AmplifierCh1.pdf
Whenever possible, we should have access at runtime to default screen
and printout
Stefan Salewski wrote:
You may compare a recent printout from gEDA 1.6.1 at
http://www.ssalewski.de/tmp/AmplifierCh1.pdf
with old 1.4.3 printout at
http://www.ssalewski.de/AmplifierCh1.pdf
Which of the two is closer to the relative size on the screen?
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin
7 matches
Mail list logo
