Re: gEDA-user: pcb: experience with import-schematics

2010-08-09 Thread DJ Delorie
> Should I produce a patch file? Yes please, with "git format-patch" if you can. ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-09 Thread Andrew Poelstra
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:35:45PM -0600, John Doty wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote: > > > Someone may write: > >> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 16:44 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote: > > > >>> > >>> Painting my house is fun, and it will look really nice. But I think I > >>> s

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-09 Thread John Doty
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote: > Someone may write: >> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 16:44 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote: > >>> >>> Painting my house is fun, and it will look really nice. But I think I >>> should repair the broken roof first, and improve thermal insulation. >>> But I

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-09 Thread John Doty
On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Bas Gieltjes wrote: > > John, > > See the attached patch for one of your notes. > >> gnetlist:get-command-line >> >> Broken or unimplemented? Yields #f. > It seems still to be unimplemented in 1.6.1. Or do I simply not understand how it works? I don't use it: t

Re: gEDA-user: pcb: experience with import-schematics

2010-08-09 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
DJ Delorie wrote: > Well, you'll have to help with this then... (...) >for (i=0; i { > pe->Name[i].X = e->Name[i].X - mx; > pe->Name[i].Y = e->Name[i].Y - my; > pe->Name[i].Direction = e->Name[i].Direction; > pe->Name[i].Scale = e->Name[i].Scale; > } Ok, found it. The names need an additional shi

Re: gEDA-user: pcb: experience with import-schematics

2010-08-09 Thread DJ Delorie
Well, you'll have to help with this then... The code is in action.c near the end of ActionElementList() : er = ElementOrientation (e); pe = & PASTEBUFFER->Data->Element[0]; pr = ElementOrientation (pe); mx = e->MarkX; my = e->MarkY; if (er != pr) Rot

Re: gEDA-user: pcb: experience with import-schematics

2010-08-09 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > I'll update and and report my mileage. Did an update and got no change. Text of replaced footprints is still offset about 15 cm to the upper left. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Ins

Re: gEDA-user: pcb: experience with import-schematics

2010-08-09 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
DJ Delorie wrote: > Is this the latest git pcb? Not quite. It is git-head from june 15th. I'll update and and report my mileage. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2

Re: gEDA-user: pcb: experience with import-schaematics

2010-08-09 Thread DJ Delorie
Is this the latest git pcb? I've had problems with getting the right coordinates for the refdes, and fiddled with it a couple of times. The root of the problem is that one of the offsets is getting added in twice, or not at all, and I'm not sure exactly how or when. ___

gEDA-user: pcb: experience with import-schaematics

2010-08-09 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
This report is mainly directed to DJ: I just tried the import schematics action on a small existing project. Changes in the schematics were a couple of thru hole footprints instead of SMD. On import I got the correct thru hole footprints. But the refdes seemed to be missing. Turned out, that

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-09 Thread Steven Michalske
I have heard of Eudora being silly with run on lines before.. On Aug 9, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Rick Collins wrote: > I am getting some emails from this list where the lines are all run together. > It seems to only happen in emails from a few particular users. Is this the > Unix/DOS LF vs. CR/L

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-09 Thread John Doty
On Aug 9, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote: > On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 11:33 -0600, John Doty wrote: >> On Aug 6, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Andrew Poelstra wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 12:51:34AM +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote: The current status of my mind: Having net c

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-09 Thread Bas Gieltjes
John, See the attached patch for one of your notes. > gnetlist:get-command-line > > Broken or unimplemented? Yields #f. Bas -- commit-156aae9 Description: Binary data ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-b

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-09 Thread Rick Collins
I am getting some emails from this list where the lines are all run together. It seems to only happen in emails from a few particular users. Is this the Unix/DOS LF vs. CR/LF thing? Or is my email program just not displaying the messages properly (Eudora). There is another list where emai

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-09 Thread Stefan Salewski
Someone may write: >On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 16:44 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote: > > > >Painting my house is fun, and it will look really nice. But I think I > >should repair the broken roof first, and improve thermal insulation. > >But I may need (support of) a craftsman. > > >But gEDA is not broke

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-09 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 11:33 -0600, John Doty wrote: > On Aug 6, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Andrew Poelstra wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 12:51:34AM +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote: > >> > >> The current status of my mind: > >> > >> Having net classes in gschem would make all much easier. > > Nothing

Re: gEDA-user: New icon set and UI changes

2010-08-09 Thread Kovacs Levente
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:14:58 +0200 Stefan Salewski wrote: > Again, we should not waste space. And I would rather see the same layout in the GTK HID like the lesstif HID. That is, I'd make the left pane removable, so we'd gain a lot of space. Just my EUR 0.02 -- Kovacs Levente Voice: +3670507

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

2010-08-09 Thread Stephan Boettcher
John Doty writes: > On Aug 8, 2010, at 3:47 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote: > >> John Doty wrote: >>> >>> Gnetlist is the *key* utility in the flow. >> >> It is just the glue between major components. No need to glorify this role. > > On the contrary, there is every need to glorify this role. An en