Not at all. Just to goad you into a further negative rant on how
a free product, created by volunteers bothers you.
George
On 12/13/2010 08:57 PM, timecop wrote:
Why do you bother to subscribe to this list? Its obvious that $0.02 is
worth more than your opinions.
Why do you bother replying?
Is
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:23 PM, timecop wrote:
> Anyway tl;dr version: RS sucks, DesignSpark sucks, Eagle sucks, buying
> a EDA suite to pimp to your customers as the only benefit of your
> shitty stock/price practice = stupid.
>
> Also any designer too lazy to make symbols/footprints for a new p
> Why do you bother to subscribe to this list? Its obvious that $0.02 is
> worth more than your opinions.
Why do you bother replying?
Is it to show you agree or disagree?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/m
On 12/13/2010 08:23 PM, timecop wrote:
Another option, that may not be acceptable to all, is that in the UK
RS& Farnell both recently acquired small PCB development
companies(DesignSpark& eagle respectively). The intention being the
companies adopt the free tool which integrates easily with
> It won't be perfect until its compilable by VStudio IDE and debuggable
> inside it as such.
> As long as GCC is involved in any equation of building software for
> Windows, no developer (who is actually paid to develop Windows
> software) is going to even touch it.
I look forward to trying your
> I've been poking at 'the perfect windows version' for some time, will
> give up on that for now.
It won't be perfect until its compilable by VStudio IDE and debuggable
inside it as such.
As long as GCC is involved in any equation of building software for
Windows, no developer (who is actually pa
> Another option, that may not be acceptable to all, is that in the UK
> RS & Farnell both recently acquired small PCB development
> companies(DesignSpark & eagle respectively). The intention being the
> companies adopt the free tool which integrates easily with their
> catalogue and then buy mor
> Is there any step by step guide to get a new HID up and running
1. Copy the "nohid" hid. Hard-code a drawing surface and zoom values,
work on getting the pcb drawn correctly *at all*.
2. add in code for zooming, scrolling, flipping, etc.
3. Add in menus and shortcuts.
4. Add in all the o
>> If you switch to gEDA, will you want a native windows build? Help with that
>> from anyone who is up on windows is on the wanted list.
I've been poking at 'the perfect windows version' for some time, will
give up on that for now.
I think I just make basic canvas and figure how to to get the ba
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:28:25 +0100
Armin Faltl wrote:
> Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > There is a difference: The rendering happens on footprint creation
> > time. It is irreversible, meaning, the text cannot be edited after
> > the fact.
> I think I got you now: you want to place one footprint per
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
There is a difference: The rendering happens on footprint creation time.
It is irreversible, meaning, the text cannot be edited after the fact.
I think I got you now: you want to place one footprint per character or
generate a footprint,
that displays your text - befor
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:31 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > ps: "Comments on this blog are restricted to team members."
> > not really in favor of crowd-sourcing spirit ;)
>
> I'm not sure when I set that - and "team members" seems odd.
I've switched comments on for OpenID authenticated users.
-
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 11:15 +0100, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:43:19 +
> Peter Clifton wrote:
>
> > http://pcjc2.blogspot.com/2010/12/geda-development.html
>
> > "I hate SourceForge" - Ok, that one was just me!
>
> no you are not!
> slow, paralyzing, unusable.
>
> launchp
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:43:19 +
Peter Clifton wrote:
> http://pcjc2.blogspot.com/2010/12/geda-development.html
> "I hate SourceForge" - Ok, that one was just me!
no you are not!
slow, paralyzing, unusable.
launchpad has some issues too, but imho it would be a good choice.
ps: "Comments on
Armin Faltl wrote:
>> The GUI might look up
>> letters as footprints in the library and arrange them to yield
>> human readable text.
> This sounds like recursive call of footprints to me
No. In this scenario, the footprints do not contain real, editable
text. What looks like text to humans is j
Hi Everyone,
I realise that I am joining a very established thread, but I'd like
to put forward 2 cents worth. Please don't be offended if what I'm
saying isn't the same as your opinion. I have used gEDA as the main
(but not only) tool for EDA in my company for two and a half years, I
don't ful
16 matches
Mail list logo
