On 2/20/11, Stephen Ecob silicon.on.inspirat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
Congrats to your new status!
The geda project got a new dev!
This is really good news :-)
+1 :-)
Thanks to the whole community!
On 2/19/11, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
I can confirm for fairly recent versions of pcb and pcb+gl.
In your example, DRC starts to complain at 7.1 mil. That is, 2 mil
too late. The discrepancy grows as the clearance grows. With an
11 mil gap I had to ask for 14.1 mil minimum
On Feb 21 2011, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Ethan Swint wrote:
I was expecting just to get back git
clone -o pcjc2 git://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git or some such, but in
response Peter has posted what looks to be an excellent guide to his
blog at
On Feb 21 2011, Ethan Swint wrote:
Fairly slow scrolling on Firefox 3.6.13 on Fedora, but it seems faster
in the sections without images. I looked at a few of the images and
they all seem to be 150kB, even though they are pretty small
pixel-wise. Much slower scrolling than other web sites.
On Feb 21 2011, Ineiev wrote:
Pushed to git-head.
Thanks,
Ineiev
Awesome - welcome to the development team. Feel free to ping me if there
were any outstanding review issues you wanted me to look at with any of
your existing patches.
I feel very guilty I've not managed to get more of your
Hello.
I'm relatively new to geda but how to make a spice simulation of
attached schema with ng spice I'm getting error on first step and that
is generating net list for the spice simulator i tried with
:~$ gnetlist [OPTIONS] -g spice-sdb filename
but it tels me that spice sdb is some kind
On Feb 21, 2011, at 11:23 AM, darko wrote:
Hello.
I'm relatively new to geda but how to make a spice simulation of attached
schema with ng spice I'm getting error on first step and that is generating
net list for the spice simulator i tried with
:~$ gnetlist [OPTIONS] -g spice-sdb
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Oliver King-Smith oliver...@yahoo.com wrote:
OK I see the error of my ways. I had to turn off the grid so I could
click on the refdes.
This brings up a good point. Very often I have difficulty selecting
small components and more significantly text in
Hello,
I am reusing a schematic which I have already made a PC board with it
while back now I want to make some modification without disturbing the
previous one, so I made a new directory made the necessary modifications
and try to generate the PCB file in the usual way. The gsch2pcb does not
find
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 15:23 -0700, Russell Dill wrote:
I'm starting a new design and all my components are metric based,
including a few 1mm pitch BGA components. I'd really like to do the
layout in metric, but I'm worried about two factors. The first of
which is that PCB does not yet have the
I'm starting a new design and all my components are metric based,
including a few 1mm pitch BGA components. I'd really like to do the
layout in metric, but I'm worried about two factors. The first of
which is that PCB does not yet have the option to store things
internally in metric (at least from
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 17:45 -0500, Vincent wrote:
Hello,
Can any body help? Thank you in advance. Vinny
In your working directory there may exist configuration files called
project, gafrc, gschemrc or similar. Ensure that these contain
valid information, i.e. paths to symbols, footprints
I use mil grids, as many boards houses expect mil units, like yours.
PCB layout is engineering, engineering involves tolerances...
I start my traces from off grid components so that the stub going from
the pin/pad is off grid byt quickly becomes on grid after the first 45
degree bend.
Steve
Russell Dill wrote:
In addition, my board house rounds everything to
2.4 format (0.1 mil). I can envision several scenarios where my design
meets DRC in PCB, but fails when I send it to the board house.
What is my best option?
Time to change the board house?
Just use imperial units and
Colin D Bennett wrote:
This brings up a good point. Very often I have difficulty selecting
small components and more significantly text in pcb, due to
snap-to-grid being enabled.
Did you try Only Names from the settings menu? I found that I
I usually have to go through the menus
then and
Is it possible to let gschem know two different symbols are the same
type component so auto-slotting works? Alternatively, is there any way
to hide some pins on some instances of a symbol? I always show power
pins, and for those components where slotting makes sense, I'd like to be
able to only
I have done something like this by using multiple symbols for a single
device rather than slotting. From memory all that was required was to
ensure the pinseq are correct and the symbols are given the same
refdes.
I'm sure someone will correct me if I have missed something :P
The recent discussion on improved grid handling would also improve this.
I work on new friendly grids in PCB. Currently i almost done and now try
to prepare a patch, i will post it in next days or hours. I also need
some help to regenerate documentation: main pdf is regenerated after
toplevel
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:52:01 +0100
Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
Colin D Bennett wrote:
This brings up a good point. Very often I have difficulty selecting
small components and more significantly text in pcb, due to
snap-to-grid being enabled.
Did you try Only Names from
19 matches
Mail list logo
