Peter,
Not sure if you are aware, but latest pcb with gl enabled
does not render stretched arcs properly. For example, a
pcb with
Arc[18 15 10 15 5 2000 90 90 clearline]
will show the arc as a quarter-circle with GL enabled, even
though it is actually taller than it is
CoBra wrote:
I'm working on a pretty big project which is essentially a Spectrum
compatible computer, which will be published as open source when I
finish it. The project is being drawn using gschem and pcb. There are
15 different schematics, each on one A4 page.
Sounds like my current
Colin D Bennett wrote:
Maybe we can store the grids in user preferences instead,
but that's potentially a fair bit of work.
Regardless of implementation difficulty, user preferences are NOT the
place to store grid configurations, since each layout will surely have
its own grid setup
Girvin R. Herr wrote:
I keep getting the following:
536:$gnetlist -g bom xx.sch
Loading schematic
[/home/gherr/projects/vds160/original/hardware/dac/docs/xx.sch]
Backtrace:
In current input:
1: 0* [bom output.net]
In
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
Arc[18 15 10 15 5 2000 90 90 clearline]
will show the arc as a quarter-circle with GL enabled, even
though it is actually taller than it is wide.
confirm.
PCB v20100929-2 as delivered by debian renders the stretched arc
correctly.
Worked.. Thanks so much!
It drove me nuts for days...
~Abhijit
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:20, Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 07:29:55PM +0530, Abhijit Kshirsagar wrote:
Hi all
I'm running PCB version 20091103 on an Ubuntu 10.10 machine.
I find that no
2011/7/13 Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de:
I remember to have been scratching my head on this, when I did my first
BOMs. My students tend to fall into this trap, too -- Even when they were
told they'd need an attrib file. The keyword backtrace suggests a severe
crash had happened. I
Hello,
Some XSPICE models have vector inputs and vector outputs. In such
cases, how to make gnetlist generate the correct netlist by putting the
node numbers or names within square brackets like this: [1 2 ]
Thanks for your help.
Anand
--
Close Windows ! Open source !!
Hi, electronics gurus -
We have an application where we need to passively monitor a digital current
loop (no data sending by us), with a data rate of 9600 baud. We already have
solutions for tapping into the circuit, but in some of our customers' cases the
circuits don't have enough drive
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
Arc[18 15 10 15 5 2000 90 90 clearline]
will show the arc as a quarter-circle with GL enabled, even
though it is actually taller than it is wide.
confirm.
PCB
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:09:13AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
There is already some information in user preference that should
really be configurabel on a per project base. Skipping through the
file:
grid-units-mm = 1
This will turn into
grid-units = mm
I was quite frustrated to
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:30:43PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
These too will be changed as we move away from a strict mm/mil
configuration.
I'm not sure what to do about them. Right now I have a giant
table of default/max/min for all these units, which totals 12
values per unit. Times
Great. As an astronomer, I really need to be able to define
my PCB in astronomical units and parsecs :-)
A while back, I had jokingly suggested supporting attoparsecs...
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:55:02 +0200
Gabriel Paubert paub...@iram.es wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:30:43PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
These too will be changed as we move away from a strict mm/mil
configuration.
I'm not sure what to do about them. Right now I have a giant
table
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:30:43 -0700
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:09:13AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
There is already some information in user preference that should
really be configurabel on a per project base. Skipping through the
file:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:05:56 -0700
Colin D Bennett co...@gibibit.com wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:55:02 +0200
Gabriel Paubert paub...@iram.es wrote:
Great. As an astronomer, I really need to be able to define
my PCB in astronomical units and parsecs :-)
You'll have to wait for 64-bit
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:02:28AM -0600, Mark Rages wrote:
Stretched arcs are a misfeature. Can they be deprecated?
Why are they a misfeature?
Otherwise, they are just another object that cannot be rotated at
arbitrary angles.
That's a separate problem.
--
Andrew Poelstra
Email:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 01:56:23PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Great. As an astronomer, I really need to be able to define
my PCB in astronomical units and parsecs :-)
A while back, I had jokingly suggested supporting attoparsecs...
And why we are at it, get rid of the 1/2 oz and similar
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:02:28 -0600
Mark Rages markra...@gmail.com wrote:
Stretched arcs are a misfeature. Can they be deprecated?
Otherwise, they are just another object that cannot be rotated at
arbitrary angles.
There is no inherent reason elliptical arcs cannot be rotated
arbitrarily.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:27:48AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:05:56 -0700
Colin D Bennett co...@gibibit.com wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:55:02 +0200
Gabriel Paubert paub...@iram.es wrote:
Great. As an astronomer, I really need to be able to define
my PCB
Colin D Bennett co...@gibibit.com writes:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:20:22 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
I remember to have been scratching my head on this, when I did my
first BOMs. My students tend to fall into this trap, too -- Even when
they were told they'd need an
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:18 AM, David C. Kerber
dker...@warrenrogersassociates.com wrote:
Hi, electronics gurus -
We have an application where we need to passively monitor a digital current
loop (no data sending by us), with a data rate of 9600 baud. We already have
solutions for tapping
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 01:01:34PM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:02:28 -0600
Mark Rages markra...@gmail.com wrote:
Stretched arcs are a misfeature. Can they be deprecated?
Otherwise, they are just another object that cannot be rotated at
arbitrary angles.
Peter Brett wrote:
Yes, both are pretty straightforward to add (I think), but I don't have
time right now. File feature requests? :-)
done: https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/810202
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
24 matches
Mail list logo
