On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 03:21:24PM -0500, kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
If I produce a layout in pcb and export the gerber files then load
the gerber files into gerbv and export once again as gerber I get
two different files
I have been reading
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
gerbv and pcb are separate programs with separate gerber export
code. How serious is the discrepancy?
I attached the gerber for the bottom copper of a simple project as both
applications export it. In a texteditor they look compleetely unrelated.
If a fab happens to
So is there a solution to this? Anybody get the wire key to work on
key press rather than on click?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Colin D Bennett co...@gibibit.com wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:50:31 +0200
Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz k.kosciuszkiew...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/11 Colin D
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 04:04:47PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
Hey all,
I have a pcb branch available here for testing:
git clone git://wpsoftware.net/pcb-andrew.git
git checkout coord6
You can now pull branch coord7 (from the same repository).
It includes all the changes
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:04:54 -0700
Colin D Bennett co...@gibibit.com wrote:
I've created gEDA/pcb footprints for the Tag-Connect
TC2030-MCP / TC2030-MCP-NL connectors. The TC2030 family of cables
have a special connector using spring-pin (aka pogo-pin) contacts and
do not require any BOM
So I follow the tutorial on creating a gschem symbol
([1]http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:tragesym_tutorial), get the .ods
template from
[2]http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/_media/tragesym:template2.ods, fill it
in with my data, save it as .csv
and execute: tragesym foo.csv
On Aug 12, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Colin D Bennett wrote:
Question: Is there any standard special attribute that can be set on
the schematic symbol so that the part (e.g., J1) does not appear on a
BOM or parts list produced by gnetlist? In this case, the footprint is
not designed to accept any
I didn't like magnetic net mode at first, because it kept guessing
wrong. Since then I discovered that I was guessing wrong more than it
was, so I kept it on. I think it just needs more tweaking to do the
right thing more often.
___
geda-user
elements. Although new pcb versions have the Import Schematics feature
which somehow reads the gschem .sch files (does it call out to
gnetlist or other tools, or is it self-contained?).
The new way is to call gnetlist to generate a meta-data action
script that pcb runs in order to generate a
Hi John,
On Freitag, 12. August 2011, John Hudak wrote:
So I follow the tutorial on creating a gschem symbol (
http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:tragesym_tutorial), get the .ods
template from
http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/_media/tragesym:template2.ods, fill it
in with my data, save it as
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 14:27 -0400, John Hudak wrote:
So I follow the tutorial on creating a gschem symbol
I think I have seen similar reports a few times on this list, see
http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/Mar-2011/msg00316.html
http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/Mar-2011/msg00318.html
and
On Aug 12, 2011, at 12:56 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I didn't like magnetic net mode at first, because it kept guessing
wrong. Since then I discovered that I was guessing wrong more than it
was, so I kept it on. I think it just needs more tweaking to do the
right thing more often.
But what the
Andrew Poelstra:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:30:34PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
...
-#define LARGE_VALUE(LONG_MAX / 2 - 1) /* maximum extent of
board and elements */
+#define LARGE_VALUELONG_MAX /* (LONG_MAX / 2 - 1) maximum
extent of board and elements */
...
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:31:39PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
Andrew Poelstra:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:30:34PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
...
-#define LARGE_VALUE(LONG_MAX / 2 - 1) /* maximum extent of
board and elements */
+#define LARGE_VALUELONG_MAX /*
But what the right thing is depends on personal style and
institutional conventions.
In this case, the right thing is to do what most people expect it to
do. The rest, such as yourself, can either disable it and manually
place nets or change the code to do what they want.
While developing Wedana project, we faced with problem of the actual
symbol library.
So I'd like to continue conversation started here
[1]http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/May-2011/msg00672.html
I read the mail list and seems following is most close to the unified
library:
DJ
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:31:39 +0200 (CEST)
k...@aspodata.se (Karl Hammar) wrote:
Andrew Poelstra:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:30:34PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
...
-#define LARGE_VALUE(LONG_MAX / 2 - 1) /* maximum
extent of board and elements */ +#define LARGE_VALUE
Andrew Poelstra:
...
You can now pull branch coord7 (from the same repository).
...
And I think Karl Hammar's segfault-on-doc-compile is fixed.
If not, please let me know!
(Using ./autogen ./configure --with-gui=lesstif make clean make)
The segfault is gone, but the missing share dir is
And we don't really need a signed type, do we?
By using a sufficiently-large signed type, all our math is
well-defined. A 32-bit signed type gives us plenty of room for
today's fab limits, and if that's not enough, a central type lets us
switch to 64-bit types pretty easily.
Am 10.08.2011 um 23:01 schrieb kqt4a...@comcast.net:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:25:35PM -0500, kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
[Jun 25 patches from https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/699497]
[compilation error in gcode.c]
Other than 'Don't do
You have no idea what that is, and you can't have any idea without
spending a lot of time actually watching a lot of people use the
software.
Good thing I've done exactly that. Peter has too.
What people report is miserably unreliable as to what the *right
thing* really is.
I'll keep
Am 13.08.2011 um 00:45 schrieb Markus Hitter:
For a new patchset, I can't promise a point in time.
I had luck! No surprises, just rebasing commit for commit was
sufficient. New patchset available:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/699497/comments/44
Markus
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
On another note, have any of you used spring-pin connectors for
programming/debug connectors to save space and BOM cost? I have been
thinking about how I would design my own spring-pin programming
We use Mill-Max 821/823 series to do AVR ISP program at work.
I can get you the exact number
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:53:52PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
Andrew Poelstra:
...
You can now pull branch coord7 (from the same repository).
...
And I think Karl Hammar's segfault-on-doc-compile is fixed.
If not, please let me know!
(Using ./autogen ./configure --with-gui=lesstif
On Aug 12, 2011, at 3:40 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
In this case, the right thing is to do what most people expect it to
do.
You have no idea what that is, and you can't have any idea without spending a
lot of time actually watching a lot of people use the software. What people
report is
Hi Colin,
On another note, have any of you used spring-pin connectors for
programming/debug connectors to save space and BOM cost? I have been
thinking about how I would design my own spring-pin programming
connector.
I've been using AVX solo stacker 16 way parts for this type of thing:
Hi John,
On Samstag, 13. August 2011, John Hudak wrote:
The file is attached. Thank you for taking the time to look at it.
The cells in the csv-file has a comma s seperator.
tragesym expects a tab as seperator.
You should use save as txt and not save as csv.
It's the step5 in the tutorial:
27 matches
Mail list logo
