>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos
>
>
> El lun, 09-06-2008 a las 04:53 -0400, Bill Cox escribió:
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > I've recently benchmarked DataDraw (datadraw.sf.net) graph databases vs
> > GNU C++ graphs built using STL lists. Large graphs (4 milli
Hi, all.
I've recently benchmarked DataDraw (datadraw.sf.net) graph databases vs
GNU C++ graphs built using STL lists. Large graphs (4 million nodes)
were built in the shape of a mesh. Then, simple depth first traversals
were performed starting from a corner, a hundred times.
The C/DataDraw ba
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 22:23 +0900, AR wrote:
> John Griessen wrote:
> >
> >> What is missing is a
> >> design "database" (a well-defined directory structure would do fine),
> >> with clear separation what is a symbol, schematics or other data.
> >
> > We now have that in gnetman and datadraw.
Hi.
DataDraw3.0 (datadraw.sf.net) is getting into workable condition now.
It supports gnetman, and persistence is now kind-of working. I'm half
way done with infinite undo/redo, and then I'll hammer out the
administration tool.
There have been several direct responses to me about DataDraw, so I'
New DataDraw3.0 code is available on datadraw.sourceforge.net. It has
been used to generate all databases for the gnetman netlist conversion
utility, as well as itself. DataDraw3.0 is the cleanest, most powerful
version of DataDraw yet, and is now well documented.
I believe this should reduce co
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 09:36 -0600, John Griessen wrote:
>
> Bill Cox wrote:
> > Hi, John.
> >
> > Here's a nearly complete first cut.
>
>
>
> Hello Bill,
>
> Here's what I've noticed so far:
>
> John Griessen
Thanks, John!
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 10:48 -0500, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Bill Cox wrote:
> >>> True... if anyone is actually interested, I'd sign up for doing a
> >>> new
> >>> version that is portable. I'd like to be able to
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 10:06 -0500, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Bill Cox wrote:
> >> are the full datadraw sources in svn?
> >>
> >>
> >>> Is wine that hard?
> >>
> >> when I don't have an x86 machine at home, y
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 08:53 -0600, John Griessen wrote:
>
> Bill Cox wrote:
>
> > It's true that DataDraw was developed using MFC on windows. I run it
> > using Wine. However, the binary needed for wine is signed in under svn.
> > Also the code generator, which
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 08:43 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
> are the full datadraw sources in svn?
>
>
> > Is wine that hard?
>
> when I don't have an x86 machine at home, yes!
True... if anyone is actually interested, I'd sign up for doing a new
version that is portable. I'd like to be able to us
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 20:26 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
> It is not clear from whats there on sourceforge. Is it true that the
> datadraw gui is only for windows right now? I couldn't even figure out
> where to begin in building datadraw. I tried
>
> cd da
> ./makemake
> make
>
> which failed
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 20:26 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
> It is not clear from whats there on sourceforge. Is it true that the
> datadraw gui is only for windows right now? I couldn't even figure out
> where to begin in building datadraw. I tried
>
> cd da
> ./makemake
> make
>
> which failed
the power I want to manipulate designs with algorithms. I'm not
trying to promote anything.
Bill
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:15 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
> Bill Cox wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I have started using gschem with David Rowe's Free Telephony Project,
> >
Hi.
I have started using gschem with David Rowe's Free Telephony Project,
and while it's great, I miss my nice hierarchical design methodology I
use for chip design with gschem. So, I added pcb output.
I haven't tested it on an real PCB designs, so there are probably some
goobers. If you do use
14 matches
Mail list logo
