Hi John,
Russell Shaw wrote:
There's no reason why a schematic and pcb editor can't have tight
coupling and still interact with all external tools.
John Doty wrote:
The architectures are different. To flexibly interact with external
tools, you need the interfaces to be simple text files.
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 19:19 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
Perhaps it would be possible to support a flag on the smaller,
clippiING polygon which makes it bully other polygons away from it,
EAGLE does this by allowing the user to assign a numeric priority to a
polygon. Polygons with higher
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 13:18 +, Robert Fitzsimons wrote:
Anybody going to 27C3 in Berlin during the 27th-30th of December? I'd
like to spend some of my spare time at the conference working on or
promoting gEDA. I've signed up to give a two hour workshop/tutorial
on gschem/pcb, so
This patch adds a keyboard mnemonic to the close without saving
option in the close confirmation dialog box.
---
po/ru.po |2 +-
src/hid/gtk/gui-dialog.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/ru.po b/po/ru.po
index aa7d90c..0fa6ea8 100644
*bump*
Can someone with push rights to gaf get Richard's gnetlist patch into
mainline?
Cheers,
Rob
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 00:22 +0100, Richard Barlow wrote:
Hi
I discovered a bug in the partslist[1-3] backend for gnetlist when
processing hierarchical designs. It strips the refdes of
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 00:22 +0100, Richard Barlow wrote:
I discovered a bug in the partslist[1-3] backend for gnetlist when
processing hierarchical designs. It strips the refdes of sub-schematic
symbols from the sub-schematic components meaning you end up with
duplicate refdes's. I've attached
Hi,
I'm a European under the age of 40, and as such my brain works in
metric. So I'll write footprints for PCB in metric, then do the
conversion over to those weird units as a last step. So I banged the
attached script together. This replaces all instances of Nmm (e.g.
'0.127mm') with their
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 16:39 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
I think recent PCB program can use mm and nm units in footprint files.
Wow! Excellent.
Do you really create the footprints files with an editor, without the
help of scripts? My sfg.rb script works fine with mm unit.
Well no, I'd
Hiya,
On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 12:44 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
Also - it would appear the changes unintentionally changed some quoted
strings (caught when attempting to rebase my branches). I'm prepared
to accept some bugs / mistakes, but really - we need to be CAREFUL
with mechanised changes
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 21:17 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
Something which has the intelligence to understand the C code as its
patching? (IE.. reference the type directly as a particular type
etc..)?
Yep. Seems like the future to me... (when it's done right)
What (if any) kind of tools
Hello,
I wrote:
I forgot to mention that this script can be used with git filter-branch.
If one has some existing commits that haven't been pushed, one can
convert them over to bool like so:
git filter-branch --tree-filter rename-bool.sh HEAD...${HASH}
Ineiev wrote:
Why not apply it
I wrote:
I started working on stuff in the PCB source, and found that it uses a
typedef called 'Boolean' rather than the c99 bool type. Please find
three patches that transition PCB over to using the c99 bool ...
Ineiev wrote:
What are the advantages? is current implementation broken for
Yo,
I wrote:
Advantages:
* Compiler is able to perform optimisations specific to the bool
type.
ineiev wrote:
Yes, it is. I don't think the gain will be noticeable, though.
PCB data are mostly ints, and pointers, and floats, and doubles.
The point is that there's this patch
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:23 -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
I have it here but don't feel like digging through it, and it seems
like it's fresh in your mind so I'll ask...Is there anything in C99
that'd allow for packing bools into a byte or word value, a-la
Pascal's packed array of boolean?
I
is necessary. If someone does have some huge changes
queued to the .y or .l files (and I suspect they don't) then we can work
that out.
Cheers,
Rob
From 1fe097f0ad591332b8bb3804630a9db607c91bdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Spanton rspan...@zepler.net
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 21:26:25 +0100
Subject
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 21:48 +0100, Robert Spanton wrote:
2. Run rename-bool.sh with the pcb source as the working dir. This
replaces switches all .c and .h files over to using bool, true,
and false. It then goes to work on the .y and .l files. My sed
fu
Hi,
I started working on stuff in the PCB source, and found that it uses a
typedef called 'Boolean' rather than the c99 bool type. Please find
three patches that transition PCB over to using the c99 bool in the
following directory: http://srobo.org/~rspanton/geda/pcb-bools/
The PCB build
I wrote:
I started working on stuff in the PCB source, and found that it uses a
typedef called 'Boolean' rather than the c99 bool type.
Dave McGuire wrote:
Does this have any implications for building with compilers other
than GCC?
If they're not C99 compatible, yes. However, if this does
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 13:30 -0500, Jim wrote:
Are there any fab shops that would be gentle with a very new, very
inexperienced PCB designer? OH and reasonable for a prototype. Last
time I laid up a board I used a drafting table and mylar. I may need
a bit of handholding as I go along.
In my
19 matches
Mail list logo
