I haven't noticed it in the future-library discussion yet, but one way
or the other, I would like some sort of namespacing or subdirectory
awareness in linked symbols. For example, I have a project with two
symbols named pad.sym on the search path. One is from the standard
library
It worked for me in gschem 1.6.1.20100214. Thanks for the tip, John!
Kai, try (component-library-search
/home/kmk/geda/gedasymbols/www/user/kai_martin_knaak/symbols) instead
of (component-library ...).
Stephen
___
geda-user
Cullen,
I suspect the TO-92A/B/C notation comes from some layout package, and
that is why other packages use other terminology. It is not in the
original TO-92 spec, which is available free (registration required)
from JEDEC at URL:
It's hard to be sure from the picture, though my best guess matches
yours. If you want to be sure, take a look in the data sheet for the
package markings section. It will tell you what to look for.
Stephen
___
geda-user
If you're looking for production quantities, pretty much every
enclosure maker, whether plastic or metal, advertises their willingness
to customize. There may be a hefty tooling fee, and they may or may
not be interested in small orders. Find a company that makes something
similar
What's the board area, and what country are you delivering to?
Gold Phoenix charges $110 for as many copies of your board as will fit
in 155 sq. in. (650 cm^2), with a cap of 100 pieces if the board is 1
inch in either dimension.
[1]http://www.goldphoenixpcb.biz/special_price.php
2010/12/31 Stefan Salewski [1]m...@ssalewski.de
But the main advantage of that shape may be, that complicated
devices
like
[2]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/56/74LS192_
Symbol.png/220px-74LS192_Symbol.png
as used in some (german) VHDL/FPGA
7 matches
Mail list logo
