John Doty wrote:
>> If it shouldn't be removed, could it be sufficiently replaced
>> by fork+exec'ing a new instance of gschem?
>
> No, because the buffers aren't shared.
Like John said.
John
--
Ecosensory Austin TX
___
geda-user mailing list
ge
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:11:18 -0700, John Doty wrote:
>> Will anyone miss it enormously if it is removed?
>
> Well, I sometimes use it when doing cut/paste between pages.
I too use the new window function for cut'n paste. However, this is just
workaround for a non functional clipboard.
---<(k
>The "New window" functiona in gschem is getting in my way (for a variety
>of rather technical reasons that I can go into if someone really wants
>me to). [*]
Neutral, leaning towards leaving it in. Especially with an undefined /
dangling [*].
On Jan 16, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 23:11:18 John Doty wrote:
>
>>> Will anyone miss it enormously if it is
>>> removed?
>>
>> Well, I sometimes use it when doing cut/paste between pages. Not too
>> often. Won't blight my life if it goes away.
>>
>>> If
On Friday 16 January 2009 23:11:18 John Doty wrote:
> > Will anyone miss it enormously if it is
> > removed?
>
> Well, I sometimes use it when doing cut/paste between pages. Not too
> often. Won't blight my life if it goes away.
>
> > If it shouldn't be removed, could it be sufficiently replaced
>
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> The "New window" functiona in gschem is getting in my way (for a
> variety
> of rather technical reasons that I can go into if someone really wants
> me to). [*]
>
> Does anyone actually use this?
Yes.
> Will anyone miss it enormously if
The "New window" functiona in gschem is getting in my way (for a variety
of rather technical reasons that I can go into if someone really wants
me to). [*]
Does anyone actually use this? Will anyone miss it enormously if it is
removed? If it shouldn't be removed, could it be sufficiently replaced
7 matches
Mail list logo
