On 4/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Svenn -
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:32:31PM +0200, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote:
A solder dot does _explicitely_ tell the reader that there is a
connection. The lack of a solder dot does not explicitely tell you
[chop]
If you want to tell
On 4/2/07, John Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:03:08 -0700
william estrada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have made my first drawing using gEDA. I have some questions about
using gEDA. In the drawing I used an 'arc' to jump over one of the
'traces'. Is the a better
I don't think there is another way but to use wire jumps to
explicitely tell the reader that there is no connection on a
crossing.
Sorry, you're wrong. The correct thing to do is the same thing
everyone else on the planet is doing. This means, crossed lines
without a dot are not connected,
On 4/10/07, DJ Delorie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think there is another way but to use wire jumps to
explicitely tell the reader that there is no connection on a
crossing.
Sorry, you're wrong. The correct thing to do is the same thing
everyone else on the planet is doing. This
A wire jump tells the reader _explicitely_ Here are two wires
crossing. Two lines just crossing may trigger the question: Are
these lines connected or not?.
And a junction (circle or dot) doesn't do this???
___
geda-user mailing list
Svenn -
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:54:19PM +0200, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote:
A wire jump tells the reader _explicitely_ Here are two wires
crossing. [chop] When
they _are_ automagically generated, like in Visio, I tend to use them
as there are no questions like do those lines cross or are they
On 4/10/07, Ryan Seal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A wire jump tells the reader _explicitely_ Here are two wires
crossing. Two lines just crossing may trigger the question: Are
these lines connected or not?.
And a junction (circle or dot) doesn't do this???
A solder dot does _explicitely_ tell
Svenn -
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:32:31PM +0200, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote:
A solder dot does _explicitely_ tell the reader that there is a
connection. The lack of a solder dot does not explicitely tell you
[chop]
If you want to tell people that they should use wire jumps in
their schematics,
So, are you volunteering to add crossing jumps to gschem? It should
be a change to the drawing engine only, and a (default off) setting
in the GUI.
I agree that *IF* we want such a thing, it should be done deep in the
draw this net line code in gschem. It would be cool auto have them
On 4/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Svenn -
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:54:19PM +0200, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote:
A wire jump tells the reader _explicitely_ Here are two wires
crossing. [chop] When
they _are_ automagically generated, like in Visio, I tend to use them
as
Since when is the offering of opinions on a mailing list the same as
stepping up as a volunteer?
It's just a general observation, that (1) the people who want
something are the most likely ones to invest in getting it, (2) if
nobody else wants to do it, it's the *only* way to get it, and (3)
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 12:39 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
So, are you volunteering to add crossing jumps to gschem? It should
be a change to the drawing engine only, and a (default off) setting
in the GUI.
I agree that *IF* we want such a thing, it should be done deep in the
draw this net
*IF* this were done, we'd need probably need to track crossed
objects as well as connected objects, otherwise the drawing code
would have to check lots of lines for intersection at each redraw.
pcb does this rather efficiently using rtrees to keep track of what's
where. Since most net lines
DJ Delorie wrote:
I don't think there is another way but to use wire jumps to
explicitely tell the reader that there is no connection on a
crossing.
Sorry, you're wrong. The correct thing to do is the same thing
everyone else on the planet is doing. This means, crossed lines
without a dot
DJ Delorie wrote:
I don't think there is another way but to use wire jumps to
explicitely tell the reader that there is no connection on a
crossing.
Sorry, you're wrong. The correct thing to do is the same thing
everyone else on the planet is doing. This means, crossed lines
without a dot
Why is the 2nd bad? Suppose one of those wires got close but you didnt'
connect that last grid space? Suppose you fax the schematic to someone
and it is hard to tell solder dots or no solder dots? Suppose some
older CAD tool you once used had a bug and didn't always include all 4
nets.
[snip]
it still bothers me though. It is like the fact that I can't get an
omega symbol after a resistors value.
I just checked in an upper case omega font file into CVS that I've had
sitting around for a while along with the magic to make it work. However,
I haven't confirmed that omegas show
[snip]
it still bothers me though. It is like the fact that I can't get an
omega symbol after a resistors value.
I just checked in an upper case omega font file into CVS that I've had
sitting around for a while along with the magic to make it work. However,
I haven't confirmed that omegas show
Hi guys,
I have made my first drawing using gEDA. I have some questions about
using gEDA. In the drawing I used an 'arc' to jump over one of the
'traces'. Is the a better way to show that lines are not connected?
http://64.124.13.3/PIC_Projects/4-bit_12-LED.png
--
William Estrada
[EMAIL
The rule is: Lines that cross without a dot are not connected. Lines
that cross with a dot are connected. No arcs are required.
A three-way connection is, obviously, connected.
Note: avoid connecting more than one net at the end of a pin; whether
you get a dot or not - and whether there's a
--
-Original Message-
From: william estrada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:03:08
To:geda-user@moria.seul.org
Subject: gEDA-user: 4-bit_12-LED.png (PNG Image, 1024x768 pixels)
Hi guys,
I have made my first drawing using gEDA. I have some
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:03:08 -0700
william estrada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have made my first drawing using gEDA. I have some questions about
using gEDA. In the drawing I used an 'arc' to jump over one of the
'traces'. Is the a better way to show that lines are not connected?
By
22 matches
Mail list logo
