On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 23:45 -0300, Facundo Ferrer wrote:
Hi all,
I have a similar issue. I think that all my schematics have valid
pintypes but the stack overflow
Have you tried this:
http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/Feb-2008/msg00277.html
It was necessary for me with gEDA
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 13:37 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 23:45 -0300, Facundo Ferrer wrote:
Hi all,
I have a similar issue. I think that all my schematics have valid
pintypes but the stack overflow
Have you tried this:
2009/9/23 Tony Radice [1]tradi...@verizon.net
Carlos -
Thanks for the reply. I corrected the part that had the wr
attribute - I did indeed mistype pwr. That was the good news -
The bad news: I still get the stack overflow error below, and now
the
output of the
Hi Tony,
wr is not a valid pintype. Do you have any symbol with this attribute
attached to a pin?
Valid pintypes are: unknown in out io oc oe pas tp tri
clk pwr unconnected
Regards,
Carlos
El jue, 17-09-2009 a las 19:17 -0400, Tony Radice escribió:
Ladies and Gentlemen -
When attempting
Carlos -
I honestly do not know - it may be a typo error on my part of a
piece of pwr. I'll open the schematic file and scan for the wr.
Thanks for the reply!!
T.
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 21:43 +0200, Carlos Nieves Ónega wrote:
Hi Tony,
wr is not a valid pintype. Do you have any symbol with
Carlos -
Thanks for the reply. I corrected the part that had the wr
attribute - I did indeed mistype pwr. That was the good news -
The bad news: I still get the stack overflow error below, and now the
output of the .drc file is:
Checking non-numbered parts...
Checking duplicated
Ladies and Gentlemen -
When attempting to run a drc on my heirarchical design, the drc
routine crashes with the following error:
Backtrace:
In /usr/share/gEDA/scheme/gnet-drc2.scm:
601: 937 (if (not (null? net-conn)) (let* (# # # #) (begin #)) (list))
...
608: 938 [cons pas ...
609:
7 matches
Mail list logo
