Stuart Brorson wrote:
>
> Therefore, I wonder if I should withdraw the footprint doc and
> point to the File Format section of the on-line PCB manual?
N! It's about the only PCB documentation that I regularly use. I
think it is a fine document.
> Or
> should I simply update the footprin
Am Dienstag, den 31.07.2007, 06:51 -0400 schrieb Stuart Brorson:
>
> Actually I haven't touched the footprint doc in over 2 1/2 years, and
> a lot of the info is therefore likely outdated.
>
I think that most contents of the footprint doc is up to date, and it is
very helpful for understanding f
This is an interesting point.
Actually I haven't touched the footprint doc in over 2 1/2 years, and
a lot of the info is therefore likely outdated.
I've never been a fan of the PCB manual since it is over 100 pages of
hard to read verbiage with no screenshots (just IMO). Newbies
probably find
The description of ElementArcs in footprint creation guide is
misleading. In current pcb measurement of positive values for angles is
counterclockwise as stated in pcb-documentation.
Wrong:
http://www.brorson.com/gEDA/land_patterns_20050129.pdf
StartAngle
Starting angle of arc –
measured in deg
4 matches
Mail list logo
