Good on you. It really gripes me when open hardware projects use something
like Eagle for the schematic/pcb flow. The current object of my derision for
doing that is the RepRap foundation. Today there are at least two reasonable
choices for open source schematic and pcb design -- why do open
Hi,
jeffrey antony wrote:
The lock names is not set.
If possible can you just download the pcb file (
http://github.com/jeffreyantony/GNUduino/blob/master/GNUduino.pcb )and
try to move the component descriptors?
So you can easily provide a solution for me.
I tried a lot
jeffrey antony:
...
1) I have some problems with the PCB files in this design. I am not
able to move component descriptors. At present many of the component
descriptors are overlapped (eg: R4 and LED14). Please let me know
how to move these. In gschem moving the component descriptors are
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 00:24 -0700, jeffrey antony wrote:
Hello ,
The lock names is not set.
If possible can you just download the pcb file (
http://github.com/jeffreyantony/GNUduino/blob/master/GNUduino.pcb )and
try to move the component descriptors?
So you can easily
Very nice design. I see you have managed to keep it to a single layer
board. Very tough to do with so many signal pins. Now I need to design
a shield for it that control motor driver H-bridges to control a
practice robot for our FIRST FRC competition!
Mike
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Dave N6NZ [1]n...@arrl.net wrote:
Good on you. It really gripes me when open hardware projects use
something like Eagle for the schematic/pcb flow. The current object
of my derision for doing that is the RepRap foundation. Today there
are
Kevin Vermeer wrote:
2. Necessary Software
If the hardware requires software, embedded or otherwise, to operate
properly and fulfill its essential functions, then the documentation
requirement must also include at least one of the following: The
necessary software,
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 19:36 +0200, Armin Faltl wrote:
IMO, a high resolution raster image of the layers and pdf of the
schematic would qualify
as open HW without problems.
So each binary executable can be considered open source -- we can
manipulate it with a hex editor, maybe with an
Hello all,
Thanks for the appreciation you have given. The main reason for me to
redesign the Arduino was the closed tool used in its present design.
Open Hardware projects should use free software for their designs. Even
the tool used for hardware design must be open or else
On Oct 9, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Kevin Vermeer wrote:
What can we do to gEDA to make it more accessible to these
folks?
IMHO, the OP is on the right track. It will take less energy and time to
simply fork the designs and push them out to a public repo than to lobby with
the originators.
I
I assume one is gEDA... what is the other?
Rick
At 01:56 AM 10/9/2010, you wrote:
Good on you. It really gripes me when open hardware projects use
something like Eagle for the schematic/pcb flow. The current object
of my derision for doing that is the RepRap foundation. Today there
are
Probably KiCad.
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com wrote:
I assume one is gEDA... what is the other?
Rick
At 01:56 AM 10/9/2010, you wrote:
Good on you. It really gripes me when open hardware projects use
something like Eagle for the schematic/pcb flow.
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 13:34 +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
If you don't show the solder layer (View-Shown Layers-Solder, or ctrl-2),
it is easier, because then you won't by mistake grab a copper trace.
Or select Settings-Only Names which will lock out everything except
text from being moved.
--
KiCAD -- I haven't tried it myself, so I don't know much about it's
capabilities.
-dave
On Oct 9, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Rick Collins wrote:
I assume one is gEDA... what is the other?
Rick
At 01:56 AM 10/9/2010, you wrote:
Good on you. It really gripes me when open hardware projects use
I thought maybe it was FreePCB.
Rick
At 09:14 PM 10/9/2010, you wrote:
KiCAD -- I haven't tried it myself, so I don't know much about it's
capabilities.
-dave
On Oct 9, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Rick Collins wrote:
I assume one is gEDA... what is the other?
Rick
At 01:56 AM 10/9/2010, you
Hello all,
I have designed a board named GNUduino
(www.jeffrey.co.in/projects/gnuduino)
Long before I had posted in the same mailing list about this board. On
that day only the designs were ready. Now I have successfully
fabricated the board. Please have a look at it.
1) I have some problems with the PCB files in this design. I am not
able to move component descriptors. At present many of the component
descriptors are overlapped (eg: R4 and LED14). Please let me know
how to move these. In gschem moving the component descriptors are
easy to move.
Make
17 matches
Mail list logo
