On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:00:18 +0200, Bert Timmerman wrote:
I think that gschem symbols in a git repository would be Really Cool
(TM). I would even join in on the fun. See
http://github.com/bert/gschem-symbols
This way *every* symbol in the repository can be corrected (improved),
or broken
Hi DJ and all,
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 21:01 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
No need to remember two sets of update commands anymore...
Or perhaps some form of blog app? I wonder which, if any, would work
for this type of data and user base.
___
Hi Alan,
On Montag, 21. September 2009, asom...@gmail.com wrote:
Please do publicize the repository. Or give me your own url, if
you're running a server.
I've pushed it to github:
http://github.com/werner2101/spicelib
I'd like to see how github works compared to repo.or.cz.
As everything is
Hi Kai-Martin,
On Samstag, 19. September 2009, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:07:29 +0200, Werner Hoch wrote:
I've all the stuff in a local git repository, I can push it to a
public repository. (github or repo.or.cz)
How about gedasymbols.org?
I think gedasymbols is not
Thanks. I'll work on integrating my Linear Technology scripts.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Werner Hoch werner...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Montag, 21. September 2009, asom...@gmail.com wrote:
Please do publicize the repository. Or give me your own url, if
you're running a server.
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:18:41 +0200, Werner Hoch wrote:
How about gedasymbols.org?
I think gedasymbols is not the right place. The spicelib does not
provide any model or symbol.
gedasymbols hosts scripts and documentation too. I'd prefer to find all
(most) resources for my favortite EDA
I favor gpleda. spice files aren't really symbols and adding them to
gedasymbols would confuse that website's purpose. But gpleda is a
multipurpose website and our spice library would fit nicely there.
-Alan
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
On Mon,
I think gedasymbols is not the right place. The spicelib does not
provide any model or symbol.
gedasymbols hosts scripts and documentation too.
I think user-contributed spice models may have a home on gedasymbols
too :-)
___
geda-user mailing
I favor gpleda. spice files aren't really symbols and adding them
to gedasymbols would confuse that website's purpose.
Hmmm... what exactly is gedasymbol's purpose ? It started as just
symbols, then symbols and footprints, then symbols, footprints, and
tools, now symbols, footprints, tools,
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:37:20 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
So a official spice lib - gpleda. User-contributed spice models -
gedasymbols. Sound reasonable?
To me, it does ;-)
I probably should figure out how to migrate to git, though, or something
more modern than cvs.
+1
No need to remember
No need to remember two sets of update commands anymore...
Or perhaps some form of blog app? I wonder which, if any, would work
for this type of data and user base.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
Please do publicize the repository. Or give me your own url, if
you're running a server.
-Alan
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:07:29 +0200, Werner Hoch wrote:
I've all the stuff in a local git repository, I can push it to a
Hi Alan,
On Mittwoch, 16. September 2009, asom...@gmail.com wrote:
That script looks good; I'll take a look at it.
I've updated the package to version 0.0.3.
* Indexed new models
* fixed newly introduced errors in the nxp model files.
* few script and test improvements.
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:07:29 +0200, Werner Hoch wrote:
I've all the stuff in a local git repository, I can push it to a public
repository. (github or repo.or.cz)
How about gedasymbols.org?
---(kaimartin)---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
Alan,
I don't do any simulation with gEDA (yet). I would like to though,
having a point of call for simulation models would be another barrier
to entry broken down.
Would it be possible for checked spice models that can be
redistributed to be uploaded to gedasymbols.org?
Andrew
On Wed,
Hi Alan,
On Mittwoch, 16. September 2009, asom...@gmail.com wrote:
So my question is, should I make a new project which is a library of
models to use with open source simulators? I think that there is a
need for such a thing, but would it be a good idea? Licensing should
not be a problem;
That script looks good; I'll take a look at it.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Werner Hoch werner...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Mittwoch, 16. September 2009, asom...@gmail.com wrote:
So my question is, should I make a new project which is a library of
models to use with open source
On Tuesday 15 September 2009, asom...@gmail.com wrote:
I, and judging from the mailing lists and forums many others,
are frustrated by the difficulty of finding spice models that
are compatible with open-source circuit simulators.
Yes. It's a problem. It's the kind of problem that will
I, and judging from the mailing lists and forums many others, are
frustrated by the difficulty of finding spice models that are
compatible with open-source circuit simulators. Common replies are
you don't need that level of detail or find a model library buried
in the vendor's website, pick a
19 matches
Mail list logo
