On Tuesday 16 Nov 2010 11:09:34 timecop wrote:
With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
(or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
Even this single sentence contains so many
I guess I didn't realize PCB was mainly for hobby use... WHAT???
Rick
At 06:09 AM 11/16/2010, you wrote:
With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
(or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
really any point on bothering improving built in
On 11/15/2010 09:24 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Stephen Ecob wrote:
Motivation
Having laid out a couple of boards with PCB 20091103 I became aware of
some bugs in the autorouter that made the job difficult:
Are
With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
(or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
Does PCB have Specctra DSN/SES export/import? Just use that (or
implement if it doesn't) and then
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:09:34 +0900
timecop time...@gmail.com wrote:
With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
(or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
Does PCB have Specctra
On 16/11/10 15:54, Peter TB Brett wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Nov 2010 11:09:34 timecop wrote:
With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
(or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Jan Martinek ho...@dp.fce.vutbr.cz wrote:
On 11/15/2010 09:24 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Stephen Ecob wrote:
Motivation
Having laid out a couple of boards with PCB 20091103 I
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:09 AM, timecop time...@gmail.com wrote:
With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
(or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
Does PCB have Specctra
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:09 PM, timecop time...@gmail.com wrote:
With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
(or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
Does PCB have Specctra
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Ecob
silicon.on.inspirat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:09 PM, timecop time...@gmail.com wrote:
With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
(or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
Stephen Ecob wrote:
Motivation
Having laid out a couple of boards with PCB 20091103 I became aware of
some bugs in the autorouter that made the job difficult:
Are you talking about the default auto router. Or is this about the shiny,
new toporouter?
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Stephen Ecob wrote:
Motivation
Having laid out a couple of boards with PCB 20091103 I became aware of
some bugs in the autorouter that made the job difficult:
Are you talking about the default auto router.
Hello all,
I've made a branch of PCB. The intent of the branch is to aid in the
debugging and tuning of PCB's autorouter and PCB's trace optimiser.
Motivation
Having laid out a couple of boards with PCB 20091103 I became aware of
some bugs in the autorouter that made the job difficult:
1 The
13 matches
Mail list logo
