DJ Delorie writes:
> The "operation" is "select". PCB doens't know *why* you're selecting,
> it's just selecting everything in a region. If you select the *element*
> should it select the *whole* element, or just part of the element?
It is possible to make parts of an element invisible
(silk/p
I didn't change the de-selection logic; invisible stuff is still
de-selected when you're selecting a new region.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:05:06PM +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> DJ Delorie writes:
> >
> > If an element is on the front side, but has pads on both sides, and the
> > back side is hidden, when you select the element, should the hidden pads
> > be selected too?
>
> No. Not for operations that
The "operation" is "select". PCB doens't know *why* you're selecting,
it's just selecting everything in a region. If you select the *element*
should it select the *whole* element, or just part of the element?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@mori
DJ Delorie writes:
> Stephan Boettcher writes:
>> Whatever the obvious thing is, the only correct thing is that
>> invisible (deactivated) objects must not get selected.
>
> If an element is on the front side, but has pads on both sides, and the
> back side is hidden, when you select the element
Stephan Boettcher writes:
> Whatever the obvious thing is, the only correct thing is that
> invisible (deactivated) objects must not get selected.
If an element is on the front side, but has pads on both sides, and the
back side is hidden, when you select the element, should the hidden pads
be s
DJ Delorie writes:
> DJ Delorie writes:
>> I had that problem with silk. I've not seen it for pads.
>
> Fixed in git head, not including any subtleties with elements with pads
> on both sides. I did the obvious thing for those, anyone who *has* one
> of those (edge connectors?) can complain if
DJ Delorie writes:
> I had that problem with silk. I've not seen it for pads.
Fixed in git head, not including any subtleties with elements with pads
on both sides. I did the obvious thing for those, anyone who *has* one
of those (edge connectors?) can complain if it doesn't do what they
expec
I found the code that needs fixing, but it brought up an interesting
question...
If an element has pads on *both* sides, and the far side is hidden, do
the pads on the far side get selected?
http://www.delorie.com/pcb/tmp/select-test.pcb
Hide the far side and box-select both elements.
Obviou
I reproduced it too, I just hadn't seen it before.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:34:50 -0500
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Stephan Boettcher writes:
>
> > DJ Delorie writes:
> >> Make the far side hidden before selecting.
> >
> > That's the point, I did! The pads select anyway.
>
> I had that problem with silk. I've not seen it for pads.
>
> >> Also, see M
Stephan Boettcher writes:
> DJ Delorie writes:
>> Make the far side hidden before selecting.
>
> That's the point, I did! The pads select anyway.
I had that problem with silk. I've not seen it for pads.
>> Also, see MinMaskGap() to fix solder mask openings :-)
>
> Well, I couldn't. I can on
DJ Delorie writes:
> Make the far side hidden before selecting.
That's the point, I did! The pads select anyway.
>
> Also, see MinMaskGap() to fix solder mask openings :-)
Well, I couldn't. I can only use actions that I know about. :-(
--
Stephan
Make the far side hidden before selecting.
Also, see MinMaskGap() to fix solder mask openings :-)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
PCB 20100929 Debian Sid
When selecting elements (whatever) by left-draging a rectangle over the
canvas, pads on the deactivated far side are selected invisibly as well.
A subsequent ChangeClearSize(selectedpads,...) also changes the
invisibly selected pads on the backside.
My boardhouse told
15 matches
Mail list logo
