Peter Clifton wrote:
> Doesn't having maintainer mode options present, but switched off -
> effect the automatic generation of build dependencies for C files etc..?
> (This is a vague memory, but not one I've had chance to verify).
>
> This commit:
>
> commit 8dbe3eb93d3281d4f0e496f68d4ba7f20e78b
Doesn't having maintainer mode options present, but switched off -
effect the automatic generation of build dependencies for C files etc..?
(This is a vague memory, but not one I've had chance to verify).
This commit:
commit 8dbe3eb93d3281d4f0e496f68d4ba7f20e78b43b
Author: Dan McMahill
When
On 6/3/09, Bert Timmerman wrote:
> Just FYI some comments on building pcb from the git repo on Fedora Core
> 5 (my ancient stuff ;-)
[snip]
> Building with ./autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode &&
> make
>
> gives no problems AFAICT and just works for me ;-)
I'm really happy to see
Part of the reason behind maintainer mode is that it often takes
"esoteric" software to rebuild platform-independent files, like
automake, bison, etc. Eliding the dependency on those allows source
distributions to offer pre-built files and avoid the neccessity of the
end user installing such tool
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Dan McMahill wrote:
> ok, here is what I have found.
>
[snip]
Thanks for the lesson on maintainer mode, never really knew what it
was all about.
> So we have 2 options that I've tested and both seem to work.
>
> 1) remove AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
>
> 2) now that we ca
Hi Dan,
Just FYI some comments on building pcb from the git repo on Fedora Core
5 (my ancient stuff ;-)
Building with ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make
gives:
-8<-8<-
if /bin/sh /home/bert/MyDocuments/MyProjects/91_gEDA/mydevel/pcb/pcb/missing
--run makeinfo -I . \
-o pcb.inf
Jared Casper wrote:
> I noticed you removed version.texi with the comment that "you have all
> the tools and makefile rules for them to be regenrated anyway." So am
> I missing something? "make version.texi" in the doc directory claims
> "Nothing to be done for 'version.texi'." and there is no v
On Jun 2, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 17:25 -0700, Steven Michalske wrote:
>> On Jun 1, 2009, at 4:26 PM, Ben Jackson wrote:
>
>>> You could push it to the repo as a branch so that other people still
>>> only
>>> had one public repo to deal with. Then after we
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:13:12 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> I'm busy with work right now, so don't know when I'll have time, but yes
> - I had hoped to get it to the point where that code was merged. I
> wanted to see a more stable PCB release out the door before that
> happened though - since ther
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:17:22 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 21:28 +, Frank Bergmann wrote:
>> Am Fri, 29 May 2009 07:25:27 -0400 schrieb Dan McMahill:
>>
>> > I just pushed some changes to part of how the PCB build system works.
>> > ...
>> > There may be some rough edges
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 01:25:10 Steven Michalske wrote:
> > You could push it to the repo as a branch so that other people still
> > only
> > had one public repo to deal with. Then after we tag and release from
> > "master" you can merge it down.
>
> just don't push your stacked git managed por
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 17:25 -0700, Steven Michalske wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2009, at 4:26 PM, Ben Jackson wrote:
> > You could push it to the repo as a branch so that other people still
> > only
> > had one public repo to deal with. Then after we tag and release from
> > "master" you can merge it do
Jared Casper wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Dan McMahill wrote:
>> There may be some rough edges left so I'd appreciate any feedback and
>> problem reports around this change.
>>
>
> Some comments:
>
> I did a fresh clone of the git repo then ./autogen.sh && ./configure
> && make. Wh
On Jun 1, 2009, at 4:26 PM, Ben Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:13:12AM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
>> wanted to see a more stable PCB release out the door before that
>> happened though - since there are many important bug fixes in PCB GIT
>> HEAD, which aren't in the last release. (
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:13:12AM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> wanted to see a more stable PCB release out the door before that
> happened though - since there are many important bug fixes in PCB GIT
> HEAD, which aren't in the last release. (Also, PCB GIT is pretty stable
> code at the moment).
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 21:28 +, Frank Bergmann wrote:
> Am Fri, 29 May 2009 07:25:27 -0400 schrieb Dan McMahill:
>
> > I just pushed some changes to part of how the PCB build system works.
> > ...
> > There may be some rough edges left so I'd appreciate any feedback and
> > problem reports arou
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 21:38 +, Frank Bergmann wrote:
> Am Fri, 29 May 2009 18:44:39 -0400 schrieb Mark:
>
> > On Fri May 29 2009 07:25:27 am Dan McMahill wrote:
> >> I just pushed some changes to part of how the PCB build system works.
> >>
> >>
> > Is this pushed to the OpenGL branch of git t
Am Fri, 29 May 2009 18:44:39 -0400 schrieb Mark:
> On Fri May 29 2009 07:25:27 am Dan McMahill wrote:
>> I just pushed some changes to part of how the PCB build system works.
>>
>>
> Is this pushed to the OpenGL branch of git that Peter Clifton is working
> on?
Maybe it's a little bit of topic, b
Am Fri, 29 May 2009 07:25:27 -0400 schrieb Dan McMahill:
> I just pushed some changes to part of how the PCB build system works.
> ...
> There may be some rough edges left so I'd appreciate any feedback and
> problem reports around this change.
Hi Dan,
just for the recommendation of a clean git
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Dan McMahill wrote:
> There may be some rough edges left so I'd appreciate any feedback and
> problem reports around this change.
>
Some comments:
I did a fresh clone of the git repo then ./autogen.sh && ./configure
&& make. Which, if I understood your post corr
On Fri May 29 2009 08:00:16 pm Dan McMahill wrote:
> Mark wrote:
> > On Fri May 29 2009 07:25:27 am Dan McMahill wrote:
> >> I just pushed some changes to part of how the PCB build system works.
> >
> > Is this pushed to the OpenGL branch of git that Peter Clifton is working
> > on?
>
> no it is no
Mark wrote:
> On Fri May 29 2009 07:25:27 am Dan McMahill wrote:
>> I just pushed some changes to part of how the PCB build system works.
>>
>
> Is this pushed to the OpenGL branch of git that Peter Clifton is working on?
no it is not. I'm not quite sure what that would take as I'm still on
the
On Fri May 29 2009 07:25:27 am Dan McMahill wrote:
> I just pushed some changes to part of how the PCB build system works.
>
Is this pushed to the OpenGL branch of git that Peter Clifton is working on?
-Mark S.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@mor
I just pushed some changes to part of how the PCB build system works.
Currently we have 2 ways people get sources.
1) download snapshot tarball files
2) via git or anoncvs
Besides some of the usual tools (a C compiler for example), there are
some additional tools needed to build a complete
24 matches
Mail list logo
